Chammiya - not abusive? - Page 12

Originally posted by: Xserial_queenX

hahahahah sorry but I don't care about what some newbie with 24 posts thinks because this looks like a fake account. Use your real account to reply to me if you need to :)

Multiple ID's (MID): If you think a member is using a MID then contact the section Dev Team. There is no need to accuse someone based on assumption. What we think might not always be true and accusing someone based on an assumption is wrong. If you have any proof and evidence with regards to the same you can get in touch with the Dev Team. They will look into the matter and do the needful. Any post accusing member of being MID member will get a direct WL raise.


You are reported

Originally posted by: Nims-

Yes it was derogatory & shouldn't have said 👎🏼

I'm really happy he is back but some of the things he says are not cool at all! 😳

👍🏼

Originally posted by: Xserial_queenX

Forgive me if I'm wrong but if you told a girl "tum ek mard ho" it would not be seen as insulting as calling a guy a "chammiya"

You know why? Because we live in a SEXIST world. I don't think what Kushal did was right but this is just an ignorant view to have; being a girl is not something which should be seen as offensive. EVER.

I get ur point but he called vivek chammiya becos of vivek's sexuality - that's why its considered more offensive and gauhar was laughing all along. its the 21st century - the world has moved on so much, I mean here in UK, even same sex marriages are allowed. but in some places in some people's mentality making fun of someone's orientation is just sick. regardless of what people say, I was utterly disgusted in kushal and gauhar for what they did and said to vivek. people who can't respect someone's sexual orientation in the 21st century don't deserve to be respected either. fair enough u might not agree to it, but it doesn't give u the right to make fun of those who are like that.