Originally posted by: kaushikbasu
1. Task performance is never a mandatory thing to stay. If a contestant is not interested in task BB can either nominate him/her directly or his/her team etc. But until and unless she breaks any contractual agreement the only option is vote her out.
2. As I have written elsewhere this attitude is a novelty for many. Unfortunately as of now there are more people wanting her to stay than other nominated contestant.
3. Yes, she might be booted out but as per her she has already said that. That might be unprofessional but believe me I know many people who has left a job within a week just because they did not like the company culture and just for most here this is more frequent than you think.
1. Task performance is not a mandatory thing to stay. Sure. But can't be waived off as optional...not in a show which revolves around weekly tasks and the contestants' performance/opinions/decisions during that task are discussed..which brings out more of their personality. That is all this show is about really. And that is why she is being nominated by the HMs which is fair.
2. Every kind of attitude has its takers in the world...so yes, she would have her admirers too. I just don't value unprofessional attitude and whims masked as funny-one-liners-and-I-Don't-want-to-stay-here rant.
3. There is a huge difference between people leaving jobs and a stint on this show. While people wouldn't have access to a company culture and can't gauge if they will fit in there without actually joining a company...in this case, she has watched previous seasons. She knows it is a glorified jail. Interaction with a limited set of people. Tasks and a certain amount of negativity. And for someone who bawled and cried about "my freedom is most important to me"...it is astonishing that she chose to step into the BB house. Even AFTER seeing all that. A very poor professional judgement or something else?
Edited by Kwerky - 9 years ago