Why Gautam did not defend himself? - Page 3

Originally posted by: pyaridilwalino1

the biggest mistake people make is to assume. And right now you are assuming gautam's thoughts.

He asked everyone else to decide he never put forth his own reasoning or idea. He knew he was wrong, but all other times he ALWAYS puts forth his viewpoint/thought/reasoning, this time he didn't. That could only lead to ONE thing...he was wrong and he agreed with everyone that he did not give any effort towards team planning and etc.

You are doing exactly what you are preaching against. It is your assumption that Gautam thinks the logic for nominating him is correct, that he is guilty and that he wants to play victim card. If you can assume then why cant others?

Originally posted by: madfan

I am very surprised that Gautam did not defend himself when the Champions decided that he is the non-performer???? He could have very well said he is the only one who actually won the task and because of him only the Champions won the living area.

By common sense, both the girls did well in tasks. And among the boys Gautam won the task and Ali/Pritam only helped in stealing and hiding in the apple task. So non performer should be Ali or Pritam,

I dont understand why he had to take this nonsense logic of Dimpy and just accepted defeat. I understand he is frustrated with them but he should have taken a stand here.

What do you think?

Gullu left their group and formed alliance with the other group throughout all tasks except the last one. He clearly behaved like a traitor. So when called nirasha janak, he had no answer except to keep quiet. Also since he is a good manipulator, he is using the situation well by playing isolation card. Hats off to gullu gulati for turning the shame into fame.

Originally posted by: shahhetp

Dear friend please follow what u preach, stop assuming GG was wrong... If he would hv not won task against Rahul I would hv agreed ur comment. Champions didn't include him while making strategy is his fault???

Originally posted by: madfan

You are doing exactly what you are preaching against. It is your assumption that Gautam thinks the logic for nominating him is correct, that he is guilty and that he wants to play victim card. If you can assume then why cant others?