Paras naming Asim for captaincy - Page 3

Originally posted by: Rahm

This is the one thing I hate about this forum. They scream about fairness when they themselves judge unfairly.

Why did Asim scream and go crazy to make Himanshi Captain unfairly? Why did Asim tear up Mahiras letter after she had given him his? The answer is he was playing the game! And he's entitled to play the game.. that's his right. Sidharth and Paras are not there to watch everyone else play. They're playing the game too. Why would they make Shefali or Asim captain? Both of them are against Sidharth and Paras and will use their captainship to remove one of their team members. It would be dumb to make Shefali, Asim or Rashami captain. Vikas is the safer bet because no one including Sid and Paras have not had issues with him as of yet so Vikas is still pretty neutral.

Also how stupid is it to say that Sidharth betrayed Asim? Asim and him are not friends and Sid doesn't owe Asim anything. If Asim has the chance he will try to take out Sid and vice versa. Both of them are there to win the game.. not sit and watch someone else win.

If you're playing the game would you choose to make someone captain who is against you or would you choose someone neutral?

Salman will not bash anyone because they made a fair decision from game point of view. Himanshi being captain was clearly cheating whereas Vikas being captain is fair because Vikas took part in the task and did it to his best capability. He didn't give up and sit on the side.

See everyone is entitled to a POV, you can't comment on anyone's judgement.

My point is very simple, its not about not playing the game, everyone has to do that to survive but screaming about unfairness when Sid and Paras do the same thing. So why the melodrama by Paras during Himanshi when he was wrong on multiple levels in the sanchalak task. If he is playing game so are they🤔

@bold - But Sid and Paras had already said ki Vikas ko captain banayenge even before the task had started so how on earth is that FAIR😆

He was not at all being fair 😅

But we still can give him a benefit of doubt.. May be he was really impressed by his game but not in earth he would've ever made him caption

@Renee and @Scorpion - See Vikas ke saath he had on and off but with Shefali and Asim its always OFF, you guys think Paras will chose either of them?? A captain has got power to nominate and Shefali Asim would defo. Band bajaofy his group. Yes he might man hi man think Asim played fair bt he wouldn't do the dumb mistake of giving Asim's name intentionally just coz he thinks they were good in the task. And Shefali toh he hates like anything😆

Chalo thats what I feel, everyone can have different opinions thats okay.

Originally posted by: Niki_cool

See everyone is entitled to a POV, you can't comment on anyone's judgement.

My point is very simple, its not about not playing the game, everyone has to do that to survive but screaming about unfairness when Sid and Paras do the same thing. So why the melodrama by Paras during Himanshi when he was wrong on multiple levels in the sanchalak task. If he is playing game so are they🤔

@bold - But Sid and Paras had already said ki Vikas ko captain banayenge even before the task had started so how on earth is that FAIR😆

I'm commenting on the fact that people expect fairness when they themselves don't judge fairly. That's my POV.

First of all the Himanshi thing happened before Paras became sanchalak. Paras also said because they cheated he can too. And apparently that's why he started cheating. Salman Khan and BB called out Shefali for her cheating because she did screw up. She went to Himanshi and said I saw Sid pull it away then when she had to give BB reason for making Himanshi Captain she said it was because Himanshi told her that Sid pulled it away and she wasn't looking. The sanchalak herself couldn't even keep the story straight.. that's why most of the house went against them.

Sid and Paras saying they were going to make Vikas captain is fair from a game point of view as Vikas is neutral and there's a chance wouldn't nominate anyone from Sid and Paras group. Also they made Vikas do the task. It's not like Vikas sat around and won. He also did stuff.

no matter how much hate paras gets...hv to admit he s the smart n cunning player

Originally posted by: Rahm

I'm commenting on the fact that people expect fairness when they themselves don't judge fairly. That's my POV.

First of all the Himanshi thing happened before Paras became sanchalak. Paras also said because they cheated he can too. And apparently that's why he started cheating. Salman Khan and BB called out Shefali for her cheating because she did screw up. She went to Himanshi and said I saw Sid pull it away then when she had to give BB reason for making Himanshi Captain she said it was because Himanshi told her that Sid pulled it away and she wasn't looking. The sanchalak herself couldn't even keep the story straight.. that's why most of the house went against them.

Sid and Paras saying they were going to make Vikas captain is fair from a game point of view as Vikas is neutral and there's a chance wouldn't nominate anyone from Sid and Paras group. Also they made Vikas do the task. It's not like Vikas sat around and won. He also did stuff.

Yes I feel the same for "people' too, though different kind.

I never said ki Shefali was right in making Himanshi captain so why bring the 'Himanshi' thing up 🤔 Himanshi might have been right/wrong but Shefali messed it up by saying two things in two places. But but, its ridiculous to think Paras played a fair game before that like comeon, he always resorted to faking and cheating even before that. Even in the transport task, he faked that Sid broke his finger while he knew clearly that wasn't the case as Salman exposed him in wkw. Even multiple times before he has himself confessed like in saanp-seedhi task ki he won't let the other team win even if its unfair. So Paras should not be a hypocrite and the last person to scream about fairness because he has admitted himself that he can be unfair to win the game even before Himanshi task.

Even if Vikas did the task, It was pre-decided that Vikas would win. Of course that can be called strategically right decision but not in any means fair. In a fair game the winner is not decided before tha game starts.