Popularity of the serial - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

34

Views

2.4k

Users

11

Likes

124

Frequent Posters

GoodDoc_2105 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
#21
Mangala never cared about the girl who is going to get married to Kundan.
She just wanted Kundan out of the picture and she never cared about the unfortunate girl whose life will be ruined by Kundan

She had an opportunity to save Urmi on so many occasions and never lifted a finger to save that girl.

All that mattered to Mangala the great is that she and her chori are left undisturbed even if the world turns upside down.

She sat and watched the girl being abused day in and day out.Only when Urmi's attitude towards N changed did she give a thought to that girl

This lady is called Noble?



Where was this great woman's motherly love when the Nandini was being abused by Harki Akheraj and Kundan why did she not stand up to them like she is doing with Anandi and Dsa?

She seems to know how to assert her rights with Anandi and Dsa then Why did she not assert her rights with Akheraj and Harki?

If she could tolerate so much violence against that child saying that she is their beendini and respecting their rights where is the respect for the child's mother's rights? Where is the respectfor the rights of that child?

This lady's selfishness and selfcentredness is over looked just because she saved that child from Akheraj sword once.

Who was Ganga to Anandi when she risked her life to bring baby Mannu to her? Why should she even care? After all weren't the police searching for Ratan and his family at that time?

Anandi is criticised for snatching the kid from Ratan but when it comes to Anandi if she goes all out to chase Mangala to get her kid back she is criticised.

Ratan's rights as father are respected by the people who question Anandi's rights over her child.

Never mind the fact that J earned the rights to be called as Mannu's father but Ratan who is as bad as Akheraj and his rights over his child had to be respected so what if the child grew up to be another Ratan if he stayed with him?

When Anandi tries to give the same kind of life her son is getting to her lost and found daughter it is said that she is luring the child with material wealth.

-------------
The great lady Mangala never acknowledged the child's need for her mother and her family and tried forcibily to present herself as father mother friend and everything to child ignoring the child's wishes that is simply overlooked by the esteemed forum members all because she is the *saviour*

Is this defined as mother's love?


prepal thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#22
The whole problem now is "Who is oppressed and who is the oppressor" Mangala who was oppressed has turned oppressor to Nimboli. Good lesson in psychology, if one gets the chance one will turn oppressor if you are inherently bad. Till now Mangala did not have a chance to show her true colours. But now that she herself is safe, she is showing what she actually is.
GoodDoc_2105 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
#23
Mangala was oppressed but it is not just Akheraj alone the reason for her sufferings. Mangala is also equally responsible for her sufferings.

Akheraj is not a strong man he derived his strength from the short comings of the people around him.He took advantage of people around him to become the monster he is.

Mangala is taking advantage the relatively shaky ground on which Anandi is standing.

What Mangala is doing to Nimboli and Anandi is no different from what Akheraj did to Mangala.

It is often said about sadists that they themselves have been abused in the past.

The fact that the child trusts her over everyone else has given Mangala the power and that power she is misusing it to ruin the child's future.

Mangala thinks their softness is their weakness and is exploiting it just like Akheraj exploited her weaknesses and fears.
She doesn't seem to understand that there is a difference between weakness and goodness.

As for Mangala don't think she was ever a great human being bordering on nobility like it was assumed by some people.

Even when it came to saving that baby she clearly said that her maa ka mamta jaag uthi when the child looked at her. The reason for saving the baby was because she was drawn to that child and nothing to do with sense of what is right and what is wrong.

Keeping the child safe all these years again it is not just her efforts but a combination of factors including the child's own survival skills compulsions of Akheraj and Harki as well as other kind hearted people like Chagini Kamili etc along with Mangala..
----------------
As for education - Mangala doesn't really realise the value of education because she herself has not seen benefits of it. So she is totally indifferent to education. It doesn't really matter to her whether the child gets education or not she is fine either ways.

Kamili and Urmi had come over to Haweli and they seemed to be quite happy with the ways things are going on in their lives so what reason does Anandi have to believe that Nandini could be in danger?
Didn't Mangala herself say that Kundan deserved to be given a chance when she let him off the hook?
Shivam was kidnapped because he was wearing N's clothes. But the people were all about to kill him despite knowing that it is not Nimboli but someone else.
It is clear that the target is not N but Anandi.
Missesha thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#24
So once again the discussion is back to 'How bad Mangala is?'' 😛
--------

Sorry, not interested in going in rounds and circles.

Mangala was once good and she was praised. She is now evil and it has been accepted.

Happy for those who like to thrive on Mangala's negativity, if that allows them to add brownie points to Anandi's character.

The initial topic was why is forum not so active? Because neither Mangala's negativity nor Anandi's dumbness is worth discussing.




Edited by Missesha - 9 years ago
SPuja thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#25

Originally posted by: Missesha

So once again the discussion is back to 'How bad Mangala is?'' 😛

--------

Sorry, not interested in going in rounds and circles.

Mangala was once good and she was praised. She is now evil and it has been accepted.

Happy for those who like to thrive on Mangala's negativity, if that allows them to add brownie points to Anandi's character.

The initial topic was why is forum not so active? Because neither Mangala's negativity nor Anandi's dumbness is worth discussing.





The discussion will always go round in circles - because there is nothing good to discuss as mentioned at bold above.

Funny thing is the yardstick being applied to degrade Mangala - she is being held responsible for Urmi's plight also😆 Mangala did not ask for K's second marriage and that too with Urmi - if both sets of parents arranged this match - what could M do? If she opposed K's second marriage - then also she would have been prosecuted of binding Nimboli with K - K would have legitimately raped Nimboli then. 😕 . Urmi was not an orphan - her parents were not some oppressed, poor people and they did love their daughter. And the same people never ever applied these yardstick to empowered people like Bhairo and Sumi - Gahna's marriage was worse than Urmi's and all Bhairo did was shaking head and Sumi shedding some tears - and nothing else - still nobody tear them apart for this - when they were in much better position to stall the marriage and even to help Gahna's parents financially.

And M was too naive when she thought of taking help from Anandi for Urmi - Anandi would have given a lecture and returned to her complacent mode - like she is doing now.
fast trak thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#26
Do we need any more yardsticks to bash Mangala?
Mangala didn't have say during K ka second wedding. She had a lot to do after the rape attempt on Urmi and Nimboli.
Mangala is anything but naive. This isn't how a naive person behaves.

I'm so happy Kamli is here with Urmi. I want Kamli to witness every lie of Mangala. How much she is going to cover with how many more lies.
GoodDoc_2105 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
#27
Mangala did not have a say in Kundan's wedding.
But she had an opportunity to stop Kundan's wedding when priest wanted to inform the police to stop the child marriage she prevented him from doing so.

Her reason for allowing the marriage to go on N will be spared from Kundan's lust.

It doesn't matter to her as long as it is not N.

Why? Becauseit didn't matter to her simply because there must be some unfortunate girls whose parents are capable of marrying their daughter into this family monsters.


When Kundan was abusing Urmi she had the visiting card of the social worker with her and what was the reason for that? Solely because she did not want Nimboli the child bride to be rescued.

If the child bride is rescued what will happen to her and who will she play momma baby game with?😛

Such noble character she had been
Edited by aparnauma - 9 years ago
fast trak thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#28
Yes if all naive people were like this then the world will be filled with so much love 😆
Fortunately Kamli isn't naive. It won't take her long to discover the hidden truths. Nimboli is a child after all. Today or tomorrow she will blurt it out.
fast trak thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#29
Mangala's negativities are not needed to glorify Anandi. Even before Mangala came on the show Anandi has displayed genuine behaviour. So no need of a side negative character to support Anandi's goodness.
GoodDoc_2105 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
#30
Anandi's behaviour towards other characters has been same from the begining.
Whether they love her or cause any harm to her she is same to all,

She helps who ever she comes across regardless of the fact whether they like her or not.

She doesn't need Mangala's negativity to shine brightly.

Since people are saying Mangala is made negative in order to make Anandi shine Mangala shined only when in comparison with Akheraj and Harki.

Anandi jumped in to help Sarita and her daughter.She didn't stop to think what she might lose if she stopped to help Pooja.

Mangala didn't do anything for Urmi simply because that means Nimboli will be also taken away from her because she is a child bride like Urmi.

Mangala would go along with Akheraj if it suited her purpose be it going along with garbage bin theory or lying about child brides.

This is only sample of her Mangala's behaviour when she was being described in glowing terms.

She would rather sit and watch Urmi suffer rather than having Nimboli being taken away from her.

So when did she ever outshine Anandi?

Anandi would never suffer the likes of Akheraj she will not let herself be overcome by fear of Akheraj that she would suffer him for years😛

Getting Akheraj thrown into prison is no big deal for Anandi but it is a major thing for Mangala who lives in fear of people stronger than her.

Little Anandi took on the might of Dsa an illiterate teenager Anandi took on a powerful politician like HS. All for what? Personal gains? No. For what she believed is justice.

If people think Mangala with her fake Devi act fooling people like Akheraj could outshine Anandi then it only proves one thing - bias against Anandi.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".