Kamal Haasan writes a letter amid Karnataka backlash

Veteran actor Kamal Haasan has addressed the controversy triggered by his recent statement on the relationship between Tamil and Kannada, offering an explanation in a written note shared with the Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce and circulated in the media. The clarification follows a wave of criticism after Haasan stated at a public event that Kannada originated from Tamil, which many perceived as dismissive of the Kannada language’s history and identity.

Haasan acknowledged the backlash and clarified that his words were never meant to compare or undermine any language. Rather, he emphasized the intent behind his speech was to underline a sense of shared heritage and cultural connection across linguistic lines. He noted that his comments were made during an event that celebrated his upcoming film Thug Life, and were motivated by warmth and admiration for actor Shiva Rajkumar, who was in attendance.

Reiterating his long-standing connection with Karnataka and its people, Haasan described his rapport with the Kannada-speaking audience as one built over many years of mutual appreciation. He highlighted that his respect for Kannada literature and its cultural significance remains consistent.

The actor also appealed for the situation not to be used to create further divisions. He spoke about the role of cinema in fostering common ground and nurturing cross-cultural relationships, suggesting that creative platforms like film should not become sites of discord.

Without retracting his earlier statement directly, Haasan made it clear that his phrasing was misunderstood and may have lacked clarity. He expressed regret over any unintended discomfort caused to those present, particularly Shiva Rajkumar, who had joined the event as a gesture of camaraderie.

Haasan’s statement ends with an appeal for calm and mutual respect, reaffirming his admiration for linguistic diversity and his commitment to using cinema as a unifying medium. He urged that the spirit behind his words be seen for what it was—a personal reflection on connection rather than a commentary on linguistic hierarchies.