The Greatest WWE superstar of all time? - Page 3

Poll

Greatest WWE superstar of all time?

Poll Choice
Login To Vote

Created

Last reply

Replies

26

Views

1073

Users

10

Likes

6

Frequent Posters

Stone-Cold thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: Unfair_Salman


Disagree. Taker is very much part of Tier 1. Beside USA, in rest of the world who are pro wrestling fans or non fans, for them Taker is like god of WWE. His streak built the brand around WrestleMania. SCSA, Rock are no.1 mainly in US but Taker is widely loved as the greatest of all time in other countries. Forget countries Taker wins every poll on their WWE Network.


Undertaker is great, mainly because he’s been consistently great for nearly 30 years 


But


He has never been ‘the man’ in any era 


When he started it was Hogan, warrior, Randy savage and flair 

In mid 90’s it was Bret Hart and HBK

The attitude era was Stone Cold and The Rock

The Ruthless aggression era was Cena, Batista and Orton 


Undertaker is great no doubt, tier 2 definitely.  But he doesn’t make the tier 1 Mount Rushmore. That’s reserved for Hogan, Austin, Rock and Flair 


Also in the UK The Rock and Steve Austin are by far the most popular superstars ever. 

Edited by Stone-Cold - 4 years ago
Stone-Cold thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche


He has lot of great matches. Drew a lot of money


His universal title reign from April 2017- August 2018 was longest world title reign of anybody since 1980s 



Lol he defended like 5 times in that reign, Vince only did that to erase Punk’s reign 

Unfair_Salman thumbnail
Anniversary 4 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: Stone-Cold


Undertaker is great, mainly because he’s been consistently great for nearly 30 years 


But


He has never been ‘the man’ in any era 


When he started it was Hogan, warrior, Randy savage and flair 

In mid 90’s it was Bret Hart and HBK

The attitude era was Stone Cold and The Rock

The Ruthless aggression era was Cena, Batista and Orton 


Undertaker is great no doubt, tier 2 definitely.  But he doesn’t make the tier 1 Mount Rushmore. That’s reserved for Hogan, Austin, Rock and Flair 


Also in the UK The Rock and Steve Austin are by far the most popular superstars ever. 


That's because his gimmick was never supposed to be the poster boy that's why. You have no idea the kinda fanfollowing Undertaker has outside US or UK. In Asian countries nobody gives a damn about SCSA or Hogan. 


and Flair has never been part of WWE. He's an all time great but outside WWE franchise.


Also, in 2013 Taker was voted as no.1 in WWE Mount Rushmore by WWE fans on their Network.

Stone-Cold thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: Unfair_Salman


That's because his gimmick was never supposed to be the poster boy that's why. You have no idea the kinda fanfollowing Undertaker has outside US or UK. In Asian countries nobody gives a damn about SCSA or Hogan. 


and Flair has never been part of WWE. He's an all time great but outside WWE franchise.


Also, in 2013 Taker was voted as no.1 in WWE Mount Rushmore by WWE fans on their Network.


The WWE network and WWE.com polls are rigged, wouldn’t trust them with a barge pole. 

Taker is over like I said, he’s been good, consistently, form 30 years.  That’s an amazing achievement 

But he will never be on the level of Hogan, Rock and Austin. He’ll always be a level below. 


What counties are you talking about?


I think the US is the most important, seen as that’s where WWE is located. 

Unfair_Salman thumbnail
Anniversary 4 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: Stone-Cold


The WWE network and WWE.com polls are rigged, wouldn’t trust them with a barge pole. 

Taker is over like I said, he’s been good, consistently, form 30 years.  That’s an amazing achievement 

But he will never be on the level of Hogan, Rock and Austin. He’ll always be a level below. 


What counties are you talking about?


I think the US is the most important, seen as that’s where WWE is located. 


How's US most important or the main criteria? when US population is nowhere near Asia.

Stone-Cold thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: Unfair_Salman


How's US most important or the main criteria? when US population is nowhere near Asia.


Because it is located there? Because 95% of WWE events are in the US? and it gets the most viewership there’?

Unfair_Salman thumbnail
Anniversary 4 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: Stone-Cold


Because it is located there? Because 95% of WWE events are in the US? and it gets the most viewership there’?


it used to get huge viewership here in Asia too till last decade if it didn't matter. they'd not have come for tours or had such massive fanfollowing. and it shows Taker's popularity who's popularity is beyond US. UK