Let's get a little civil in our reactions to remarks about the story-line.
And let's look at the facts till now:
1. Meher DID tell Sarab and Sarab ACCEPTED the child
2. Meher loves Param without any restraint and without any pecuniary intentions. She simply genuinely loves the little one. It's for his sake she agreed to stay on (- and well yes, underlying falling in love with Sarab)
3. Harleen finds out about Meher's period of being pregnant - details of which should not have been given by any medical person. So, she was already on the wrong side of ethical behaviour
4. Harleen does not accept that Sarab has accepted Meher's child. It's NONE of Harleen's business that he has done so. Worse, she actually attacks Meher on account of it.
Again, with that, she acts on the wrong side of ethical behaviour.
5. Harleen does not accept when both Meher and Sarab explain that Meher had no idea of the division of property. OK, in her anger she may ignore Meher's words, but why would she not accept Sarab's? They have been such close siblings
In short, the whole story-line now may actually be given the title: "The Wrath of Sister Harleen"
For it's her anger that spoils everything and overlooks everything good 🤢
What it will lead to is anybody's guess - but it's actually rather DISAPPOINTING, that, again, we see rubbish, anger, kharabness overtake what could - and should - have been a nice human love story evolving 😕
comment:
p_commentcount