New York Times called Lataji a so called singer !! - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

11

Views

1487

Users

5

Likes

11

Frequent Posters

RamSiyaRam thumbnail
Anniversary 8 Thumbnail Group Promotion 5 Thumbnail Engager 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: ChotaBheem


In the first para they wrote she sang vocals for Bollywood heroines for decades
Then later they say so called singer. 


Thats contradicting themselves😆😆 Iska matlab voh log murkh bhi hai. Careless toh the hi.
Illyrion thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago
They didn't insult her and they are not writing for an Indian audience so please don't read it as if they are. Playback singer is NOT a term used in America and that is the long and short of it. They describe her career earlier in the article and quote someone referring to her as an icon. They weren't calling her a "so called singer" they called her a "so called play back singer" because in America she would not be so called. In the next sentence they define the unfamiliar term for their American audience. There is nothing insulting there.