I don't know if Laila is supposed to have heard that exchange!
I thought she fumed seeing them in that position!
I thought we agreed that the relationship Laila and Rudra share is with each other's consent so why the conclusion that Laila allowed hself to be disrespected and used?
We don't know the background but it's very unfair to say only the woman there is to blame because the man now has a beautiful woman in his life to 'heal' him!
If Paros nature were all that mattered then Rudra would never have manhandled her or abused her as is being alleged...he would have let her go by now...the kind of man he is he would send her far far away from himself if her tenderness and softness and other qualities were to evoke positive responses in him!
Fact is he sees her as a witness and with Laila he has a relationship! The trip and catch was spontaneous and while it was sweet of him to ask if she was ok I don't think her nature made him ask that...didn't he drag her around after that as well?
I am surprised to see posts saying women like Laila who seduce men don't deserve the tenderness that sweet innocent Paro deserves! Come on,,.! We weren't shown who went to whom initially right and how the relationship started!
And it was purely physical from Rudra's POV only...Laila always thought he would change for her!
Where did the question of disrespect come in...are we now saying because she was in a physical relationship for that long without asking for commitment she doesn't deserve to have feelings???
But Rudra who was also in the relationship deserves to move on and have a lovey dovey wife with an angel who heals him?? Because he made it clear he wasn't going to commit?
That's even worse than what some were complaining about ...that the female lead should always transform the male lead with great pain!!
comment:
p_commentcount