Confused Confused !!! - Page 3

Originally posted by: BullsEye777

Today's comments by judges just went against each other's thoughts. Each person has their own likes and here we viewers try and judge based on that. That is why I want to see the decision-making scenes

For Devyani

Chef S:
While cooking: Do you think this is sufficient? (Or something like that)
During judgement time: The side dish was not required. The main was sufficient

Chef S: Your sweet dish is somewhere in between **takes the spoon and lets the sweet flow to show the consistency and his dislike for it
Chef K: I like the consistency of your sweet dish, but it is too sweet for me

And I would not say much about the second comment. In that gudbud round, K had been fine with the sweetness while S had wanted more for the mango mousse. So it is just individual taste

And that's why the 3rd judge's comments are imp. It'll act as a check & a balance!

This show has no logic in it

Of course there is a logic - sympathy

People from affluent backgrounds shouldn't participate!

Master Chef in star is a modified Daily Soap and nothing more.Instead of regular commercial daily soap they have modified it and named it reality show with ZERO reality.Every bit is scripted and final winner who will be eliminated when everything is planned only thing is it is executed badly.There are N number of instances which show poor execution.Judges are biased to core.They will say your dish lacked this this this and proclaim you winner.The Episode of cooking with your guru's Navneet the great plans to make 6 dishes 30 mins left nothing is ready and the best part 30 secs left he starts rolling the pita bread and voila bread is ready and beautifully plated and earns Flavor e Azam.I guess SP is better of doing Ekta soap rather than such show as it just leaves a bad taste.Yasmeen stays because she is poor and has kids .If you guys remember last years Master chef Shipra Khanna the winner was a single mother fighting for custody of her children.So MC is not about talent its about sympathy and drama

Originally posted by: ~Raina~

Of course there is a logic - sympathy

People from affluent backgrounds shouldn't participate!

Khokhu wouldn't add enough drama like Yasmin.
Khokhu may have stated her profession and that she is illiterate.

Yasmin kept talking about her situation all the time. That she had children to support. Everything was mere bachon ke liye.

Khokhu took pride in what she did. Even if she was a cook in people's house she never kept harping about her misery/poverty

I would have loved watching Sachin make the ravioli in less than 30 mins. Remember the 'expert' Navneet could not do it and they were struggling with the machine. And that is why I hate the editing as more than required is hidden from viewers. Sachin's sound byte indicated that Navneet had told him how to use the machine which means we had a guy who has never made/seen how pasta is made and in some 10-15 mins had to make the raw pasta, cut it and fill it. After all time was required to steam it as well. I am assuming that the khokum stuff and filling was already prepared for him to have completed in such short time.

From an Indian cooking perspective, wouldn't it be educational to have shown glimpses of how ravioli is made than show Ripu screaming to Khoku and her getting confused on how to make her food 'stand' on the plate

Originally posted by: hamzanuha

Then why didn't the judges keep back Khoku, like someone said. She'd be one of the most derserving then.

^^ 45 minutes was the given time