Poll
Who is your favorite Pandava queen?
Poll Choice |
---|
It's true that many of the warriors on the Pandava side were not sinless, such as Drupada and Ghatotkacha, just as some in the Kaurava side too were virtuous, such as Vikarna. However, if the adharmis were what he wanted destroyed, he could have engineered it so that the adharmi warriors on both sides - Bheeshma, Drona, Ashwatthama, Duryodhan, Dushashan, Shakuni, and on the other side, Drupada, Ghatotkacha and anyone else who wasn't virtuous would get killed. Or at least, if he thought it was important to protect the Pandavas @ all costs, why not extend the coverage to Abhimanyu, Draupadi's sons, and a few others like Uttara's brothers? For instance, on the 18th night, since he kept the Pandavas & Satyaki away from their camp anticipating Ashwatthama's attack, he could have asked Draupadi's sons to join them as well.
It wasn't merely adharm that Krishna wanted to destroy - he wanted to relieve Bhudevi's burden of most warriors on earth, or at least the active ones.
If Karna had not slain him with his dart in great battle, I myself would have had to slay Bhima's son Ghatotkacha. From desire of benefiting you, I did not slay him before. That Rakshasa was inimical to Brahmanas and sacrifices. Because he was a destroyer of sacrifices and of a sinful soul, therefore hath he been thus slain.
Vibs
I didn't get what you meant by 'Iravana' being meant to be sacrificed. Ghatotkacha was - to spend Karna's shakti*. But Iravana was killed by another rakshasha Alamvusha, who was the brother or son of Bakasura. This rakshasha warrior created havoc in the Pandava ranks, and only Abhimanyu repelled him once, but everyone else, including Bhima, was unable to defeat him. Ghatotkacha killed him in battle on day 14, while Arjun was invading Jayadrath's kamal-vyuha.My point above - as you mentioned, that gem could be used on more than one person, and Uloopi used it for her husband. But her son died even b4 that. Couldn't she then have gone to Kurukshetra and revived him? And while she was @ it, maybe revive some of the other Pandava fallen?
Iravana was killed on day 8 of the war. Arjun downed Bheeshma on day 10, and it was due to his using Shikandi as a sheild that angered the Vasus. If you recall, Bheeshma was the 8th Vasu incarnated (the first 7 were the babies that Ganga drowned) so when Arjun felled him, the Vasus were angered and cursed Arjun to be killed by his own son Babruvahana. Uloopi overheard this and decided to save him. (This is from the ACK Uloopi)
But all this was after day 10. Day 8, Iravana had already been killed by Alambusha. So is the only reason that Uloopi was nowhere near, and didn't find out until later, whereas in Arjun's case, she anticipated it and was there to save him?P.S. One thing I didn't understand in your previous post. If Adhirath & Radha were alive, why would the Pandavas be the ones raising Vrishasena? If he was all that was left of their children & grandchildren, one would think they'd be even more protective of him in their remaining years, just like the Pandavas (in Vyasa's Mahabharata) cherished Parikshit.
comment:
p_commentcount