♪ ♥ O Humnava Tum Dena Saath Mera ❘❘ Episode DISCUSSION Thread #1 ♥♪- Page 106

Originally posted by: averma1

Please no Malti needs to focus on herself not on her son or son in law. We have seen how bullying she can be in the aunty partner phase. She speaks her mind and is not a meethi churi like Sudha but she is equally bad.

The way she is always interrupting her bahu-beta romance nd her son not drinking milk I am not interested in both the moms

Originally posted by: averma1

Now coming to the music that played in the background. Though till date Rakshit and Aparajita have been compared to Shiva and Parvati today the parallel was made to Ram ji and Sita ji he isn't walking away out of arrogance or spite toward his mother, Sudha; he is choosing moral duty over toxic family obligations. Leaving his childhood home hurts deeply, but staying meant condoning injustice against his wife.By choosing Aparajita over Sudha’s manipulative demands, Rakshit honors his vows. The bhajan reinforces that protecting his wife’s dignity (Aparajita’s samman) is his true moral path (dharma), even if it costs him his relationship with his mother.

The sacred tones of the bhajan highlight that by stepping away from deceit and manipulation, Rakshit and Aparajita are preserving their own purity of intent, setting out to build a home rooted in truth and mutual respect.

Lord Ram’s departure from Ayodhya was not an act of rebellion, but a duty driven by righteousness, taking his wife Sita and leaving behind his family and home. Playing a Ram bhajan as Rakshit steps out of the Bharadwaj house draws a direct parallel to

When Rakshit bought flowers to adorn Aparajita’s wrists and hair, another parallel to Ramji and Sitaji when rhey were in exile Ram lovingly made jewelry out of flowers to adorn Sita.

From shiv parvati too ram nd sita.But u are forgetting sita did give agnipariksha.(Lord Rama embraced Sita and told he never doubted her but it was his duty to satisfy the minds of others and to retain respect as a King)Showmaker should decide which era the show is made for ? He left kingdom to keep promise made by his father to Kaikeyi so that ram doesn't become king of kingdom.To keep his father word he did that.

In itv the promises are taken as joke compare to old era's

Didn't rakshit leave house to support his wife dignity nd self respect?

Is writer suffering memory loss specially when it comes to appu's dialogue?

Appu saying she will get all of them back? Whole family didn't want them to leave only 3ladies?

Appu giving gyaan to aaru to look after family like she ever behaved maturely.She was literally making face when viv was trying to stop rakshit.

I didn't even like that scene that scene between appu and aaru

You can tell those things to people who are responsible person not like character like aaru.

I liked vivaan he doesn't want to run Co. he said he like being his brother nikaama brother and wants to go with them

Viv is seeing true color of aaru and i am sure after mms truth he will try to divorce her or aaru looking at vivaan is not so ambitious divorcing him too.

I don’t know why the makers decided to change the Shiv Parvati parallel to that of Ram Sita.However be it Shiv and Parvati or Ram and Sita their devotion towards each other was total. If Ram asked Sita for agnipariksha it was to protect her from society’s taunts, ironically it is that society that ended up being the cause of their separation. It is possible that in the future they may create situations where doubt is cast Aparajita’s character, could be because of Aaru in her bid to keep Sudhas hatred for Aparajita alive. We have all seen the low level that Aaru can stoop to to get what she wants.

Till date Rakshit has always done the unexpected, if agnipariksha situation arises he may surprise us yet again by breaking the agnipariksh like he did the Shuddhikaran. Let us sit back and watch what the makers have in store for us.