Non Cooperation Against Ranveer Singh By FWICE - Page 26

And pralay is said to be on track to start this augast. Source of the film said the FWICE directive has not effected the film

Originally posted by: Bagarh.Billa

Abey besurey Raag, kya filmon ki bhua ke jaise melodrama kar raha hai? Kya palti maari hai bata? Tum chindi se fans ko kuch samajh aata nahi bas online aake sabko judge kari jana hai.

I am no filter guy so better keep your assessment with you only.

Aww, itna bura laga. Kadwi sachai? Tu palti marta reh, tujhe dekh kar bas ab hasi aati hain ki kahan se kahaan tu koodta hain. Nautanki. No filter

https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/bollywood/scoop-salman-khan-turns-cupid-in-ranveer-singh-farhan-akhtars-don-3-war-superstar-steps-in-to-broker-peace/

Is Bollywood taking 'ban' on Ranveer Singh seriously? Experts weigh in

Ranveer Singh's fallout with Farhan Akhtar over Don 3 has stirred debate in Bollywood. As experts weigh in on the directive issued by FWICE, questions are being raised about the body's authority and relevance.

Bollywood has seen actors walk out of films; producers publicly vent frustrations, leading to friendships imploding overnight. But the latest controversy involving Ranveer Singh, Farhan Akhtar and a non-cooperation directive from Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE) has triggered a larger debate: does a body like FWICE really have the authority to “ban” a superstar? And more importantly, is anyone in the industry even taking it seriously?

The controversy erupted after FWICE issued a non-cooperation directive against Ranveer Singh, amid his fallout with Farhan Akhtar over Don 3. Reports also claimed that Akhtar’s Excel Entertainment had demanded Rs 45 crore in damages towards pre-production expenses. According to the claims, the actor exited the film just two weeks before it was scheduled to go on floors, leading to major financial losses.

While neither Ranveer Singh nor Farhan Akhtar has publicly spoken in detail about the dispute, the federation’s move has left many trade insiders questioning both its intent and legitimacy. While the directive does not ban Ranveer from working, it bars members affiliated with the body from collaborating with the actor.

FWICE cannot stop anyone

In a conversation with India Today, trade analyst Komal Nahta described the move as "kiddish." He compared the situation to “two kids fighting”, with one trying to make a point by threatening consequences. According to Nahta, the federation may have felt insulted because Ranveer allegedly ignored multiple notices sent to him. "But maybe he didn’t turn up because he doesn’t consider them the proper forum," Nahta said.

He further explained that FWICE is neither a judicial body nor a statutory body, nor even government-appointed to stop anyone from working. At best, he said, the federation can only advise its members.

This is also why many within the industry believe FWICE may have unintentionally weakened its own position by going public with the directive. “They may have won the dispute, but lost the war. Now, if something genuinely serious happens in the future, people may not take them seriously,” Nahta added.

Non-cooperation directive uncalled-for

Film business analyst Girish Wankhede echoed a similar sentiment, stressing that this was essentially a conflict between two industry stakeholders that should have remained a private matter. “This was purely a conflict between Ranveer Singh and Farhan Akhtar. Such issues happen all the time in the film industry, and most get resolved amicably. This was uncalled for," he added.

And Bollywood history has proven that for years. From Salman Khan and Shah Rukh Khan’s infamous fallout to actors exiting films days before shoots, or even someone like Kishore Kumar getting banned by All India Radio, the industry has survived much messier situations. Most disagreements eventually get sorted behind closed doors because, at the end of the day, too much money, reputation and business are at stake.

This is why many insiders are questioning why a trade body stepped in with such dramatic language instead of acting as a mediator. “These bodies are meant to resolve issues, not make them more serious. Their first approach should have been to make both parties sit together and talk," Wankhede said.

But what actually went wrong?

While speculation around Don 3 has been running wild online, neither side has officially laid out their version in detail. However, Nahta claimed there is a loud buzz around how Ranveer had concerns regarding the script. And if Farhan chose not to comply, the blame cannot lie completely on Ranveer.

And from an actor’s perspective, that argument does make sense. After all, stars today aren’t merely performers. They are brands carrying massive box-office pressure on their shoulders. One wrong film can dent years of momentum.

"Every actor wants a blockbuster. If someone feels the script isn’t working, they have the right to ask for changes," Nahta said, adding how many in the industry are thus refusing to view this as a simple “unprofessional" or "non-cooperative" move.

The ego battle nobody wants to admit

Beyond the legalities and trade politics, there’s another layer to the story: ego.

FWICE reportedly sent multiple notices to Ranveer Singh, and his alleged lack of response appears to have aggravated matters further.

Wankhede admitted that this may have turned into an ego issue for both sides. He said, "Actors have egos, yes. But there are several ways to reach a star. Everybody in the industry knows stars don’t always respond to notices or calls directly. You can still reach them through the proper channels and resolve things."

Nahta, meanwhile, feels the public nature of the directive itself reveals the intent behind it. “They wanted to get him on his knees publicly. But he’s having the last laugh because, honestly, nobody in the industry is taking this directive seriously," he said.

So what happens next?

Industry insiders believe there are only two realistic outcomes. One: Ranveer completely ignores the directive and moves on, treating it as irrelevant. Two: a mediator steps in quietly, conversations happen behind closed doors and the issue gets resolved without further drama.

Nahta also shared with us that the actor is unlikely to approach the federation legally because doing so would unintentionally validate their authority. “If he goes to court or responds strongly, it gives them more importance. He may just sort this with Farhan on a personal note,” he said.

For now, Don 3 remains one of Bollywood’s most anticipated projects, Ranveer Singh remains one of the industry’s biggest stars, and FWICE’s move has sparked a larger conversation about power, authority and relevance in modern Bollywood.

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/bollywood/scoop-salman-khan-turns-cupid-in-ranveer-singh-farhan-akhtars-don-3-war-superstar-steps-in-to-broker-peace/

The last time bhai played cupid, we got Vamika and Akaay...lol. Ngl I do not know why I had a feeling he may intervene, ofc assuming this is true cause BW Hungama can be super unreliable.

https://x.com/i/status/2059977264759177672

Originally posted by: elaichichai

Is Bollywood taking 'ban' on Ranveer Singh seriously? Experts weigh in

Ranveer Singh's fallout with Farhan Akhtar over Don 3 has stirred debate in Bollywood. As experts weigh in on the directive issued by FWICE, questions are being raised about the body's authority and relevance.

Bollywood has seen actors walk out of films; producers publicly vent frustrations, leading to friendships imploding overnight. But the latest controversy involving Ranveer Singh, Farhan Akhtar and a non-cooperation directive from Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE) has triggered a larger debate: does a body like FWICE really have the authority to “ban” a superstar? And more importantly, is anyone in the industry even taking it seriously?

The controversy erupted after FWICE issued a non-cooperation directive against Ranveer Singh, amid his fallout with Farhan Akhtar over Don 3. Reports also claimed that Akhtar’s Excel Entertainment had demanded Rs 45 crore in damages towards pre-production expenses. According to the claims, the actor exited the film just two weeks before it was scheduled to go on floors, leading to major financial losses.

While neither Ranveer Singh nor Farhan Akhtar has publicly spoken in detail about the dispute, the federation’s move has left many trade insiders questioning both its intent and legitimacy. While the directive does not ban Ranveer from working, it bars members affiliated with the body from collaborating with the actor.

FWICE cannot stop anyone

In a conversation with India Today, trade analyst Komal Nahta described the move as "kiddish." He compared the situation to “two kids fighting”, with one trying to make a point by threatening consequences. According to Nahta, the federation may have felt insulted because Ranveer allegedly ignored multiple notices sent to him. "But maybe he didn’t turn up because he doesn’t consider them the proper forum," Nahta said.

He further explained that FWICE is neither a judicial body nor a statutory body, nor even government-appointed to stop anyone from working. At best, he said, the federation can only advise its members.

This is also why many within the industry believe FWICE may have unintentionally weakened its own position by going public with the directive. “They may have won the dispute, but lost the war. Now, if something genuinely serious happens in the future, people may not take them seriously,” Nahta added.

Non-cooperation directive uncalled-for

Film business analyst Girish Wankhede echoed a similar sentiment, stressing that this was essentially a conflict between two industry stakeholders that should have remained a private matter. “This was purely a conflict between Ranveer Singh and Farhan Akhtar. Such issues happen all the time in the film industry, and most get resolved amicably. This was uncalled for," he added.

And Bollywood history has proven that for years. From Salman Khan and Shah Rukh Khan’s infamous fallout to actors exiting films days before shoots, or even someone like Kishore Kumar getting banned by All India Radio, the industry has survived much messier situations. Most disagreements eventually get sorted behind closed doors because, at the end of the day, too much money, reputation and business are at stake.

This is why many insiders are questioning why a trade body stepped in with such dramatic language instead of acting as a mediator. “These bodies are meant to resolve issues, not make them more serious. Their first approach should have been to make both parties sit together and talk," Wankhede said.

But what actually went wrong?

While speculation around Don 3 has been running wild online, neither side has officially laid out their version in detail. However, Nahta claimed there is a loud buzz around how Ranveer had concerns regarding the script. And if Farhan chose not to comply, the blame cannot lie completely on Ranveer.

And from an actor’s perspective, that argument does make sense. After all, stars today aren’t merely performers. They are brands carrying massive box-office pressure on their shoulders. One wrong film can dent years of momentum.

"Every actor wants a blockbuster. If someone feels the script isn’t working, they have the right to ask for changes," Nahta said, adding how many in the industry are thus refusing to view this as a simple “unprofessional" or "non-cooperative" move.

The ego battle nobody wants to admit

Beyond the legalities and trade politics, there’s another layer to the story: ego.

FWICE reportedly sent multiple notices to Ranveer Singh, and his alleged lack of response appears to have aggravated matters further.

Wankhede admitted that this may have turned into an ego issue for both sides. He said, "Actors have egos, yes. But there are several ways to reach a star. Everybody in the industry knows stars don’t always respond to notices or calls directly. You can still reach them through the proper channels and resolve things."

Nahta, meanwhile, feels the public nature of the directive itself reveals the intent behind it. “They wanted to get him on his knees publicly. But he’s having the last laugh because, honestly, nobody in the industry is taking this directive seriously," he said.

So what happens next?

Industry insiders believe there are only two realistic outcomes. One: Ranveer completely ignores the directive and moves on, treating it as irrelevant. Two: a mediator steps in quietly, conversations happen behind closed doors and the issue gets resolved without further drama.

Nahta also shared with us that the actor is unlikely to approach the federation legally because doing so would unintentionally validate their authority. “If he goes to court or responds strongly, it gives them more importance. He may just sort this with Farhan on a personal note,” he said.

For now, Don 3 remains one of Bollywood’s most anticipated projects, Ranveer Singh remains one of the industry’s biggest stars, and FWICE’s move has sparked a larger conversation about power, authority and relevance in modern Bollywood.

Nahta, meanwhile, feels the public nature of the directive itself reveals the intent behind it. “They wanted to get on his knees publicly. But he’s having the last laugh because, honestly, nobody in the industry is taking this seriously"

Totally agree with komal nahtha and girish here, glad that more from the industry are coming out to say that what FWICE and farhan are doing is wrong. As Komal said, they wanted to blackmail and publicly humiliate ranveer by doing this, when this matter could have been resolved privately behind closed doors. And ranveer is having the last laugh by showing a dignified silence and not responding to this joke of an organisation. And yes, just because FWICE are asking workers not to work with ranveer does not mean people are going to listen to them, it is upto the workers what they want to do, and many workers have even spoken out against FWICE, and as komal said, nobody in the industry is taking this seriously

What? It happens all the time? Here on this thread the way people were losing it and having meltdowns like as if Ranveer stole their inheritance, one would think the poor souls never saw another actor leaving a movie...

Wait, who are they kidding? We all know that it is not about leaving the movie which they care two hoots about....Its about Ranveer...Just like they were losing it before Dhurandhar's release and called it a failure even before its release and attributed it to Ranveer..(Its another thing these same confused souls had a brainfog and now calling it Dhar's success)...Its a good thing nobody takes them seriously....

Originally posted by: oyebollywood

https://x.com/i/status/2059977264759177672

What has this got to do with this thread? on the top of it, its such a long post...

Yes...loss of 45 Crs to a producer because an actor finally saw some success is NO BIG DEAL. Happens all the time!!! 😂

Some people are acting like they've never seen any success before. Reminds me of the bhik-mange who win the lottery, finally come into some money and start acting like they own the world with a massive Gold Chain around their neck to show the world they have some money. 🤣🤣🤣

Imagine Raj Kumar Rao acting like the whole world is jealous of his success after Stree 2. Log pathhar marte!!🤣🤣🤣

Calm down, the whole Bollywood isn't conspiring against Ranveer Singh or jealous of his success. He's literally friends with everyone from this so called "Bolly Mafia" and almost exclusively works with them, literally has the most aggressive PR in Bollywood and has always been an attention freak.

But if you're going to "Scam" a friend and cause massive losses, the producer has the right to recover his money without being vilified by stans.