Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki: EDT - 41 (DT Note pg: 132) - Page 60

Originally posted by: sadiltl

@bold because they are useless. DK is being butchered too.

Morality is expected from Mannat not because she is woman, she is the only one who is raised well. And only one writers are little consistent.

Morality cannot be expected from anyone just bcz their character has been written somewhat okay or raised well..also there is no guarantee 100 percent that people who are raised well are going to be nice, full of morals in the future...thats setting unrealistic expectations..

Also majority of us have agreed here that none of the actions of the character are 100 percent positive, all have grey shades including Mannat so there is really no point in setting any expectations..

Also to add, just bcs we individually feel that what person A or person B did is wrong doesn’t automatically translate as wrong...from situation point of view if that character feels he/she did right then they will proceed accordingly...

Originally posted by: sadiltl

This is where you confuse me moory. You say no one is dhudh ka dhula. But when I say mannat has her own setbacks, you will not agree with me and say morally she is right. I really dont understand.. Main thing being NOT asking DK to find a family.

IT is not right to live with a person like that without bothering about his future...while she anticipates to forgive Vik on one sorry and move with him(I have heard more than 2 monologues of hers where she says she is waiting for just one sorry). Did she think or ask DK what are his future plans. She is sharing her kid with him, who is attached to him. it is a big deal

You didn't get me when I said doodh ka dhula... each character has lied at some point not just Mannat... even Vik has.. maine sirf uss reason se bola...

This is in context of mannat hiding Aman truth from Vik... she was ready to tell him, was pleading with RoTu to reveal it to him till they find out Vish was even worse and Neetu silenced her with suicide threat.

I see it as Mannat protecting Vik because of her own experience with her birth trauma RD sees it as lying. We have been disagreeing over this since months now.

Its a morally debatable question whether to hide such a shocking truth from your partner. And there are 2 clear teams in FD over this.

Now the question about DK is... they ... meaning Mannat Ronnie and DK have mutually agreed to pretend to be Duas parents... and DK Mannat are not revealing it to anybody. Neetu knows but hasnt said anything to Vik either.

Ronnie knows Mannat is holding on to Vik... but after he sees Vik about to marry Y, he has asked Mannat to move on in her life too... hinted as DK...

DK wonders whats Mannats answer gonna be... so its a clear hint he wants a future with her. Not just Dua. But he hasnt voiced it to Mannat yet. As per her he is good friend who has consented for this pretense.

Mannat hasnt thought on that suggestion from Ronnie, though she is keeping distance from Vik. Neither is she able to move on from Vik. She still loves Vik which DK knows too... yet he waits for an answer from her.

Yahi Mona was telling you... why his motives are not pure as they were early in the leap.

The VOs are her thoughts... but she is not acting on it.

As of today, there are no plans of getting back with Vik. Even in the bts she is asking Vik to not reveal it to Dua and he agrees ki soch samjh ke karenge kuch bhi.

Originally posted by: Rdigest

I didn't see this post earlier ❤️ this is exactly what I wish to see.

It means you are ignoring my posts again 😭😭😭😭

I wrote this few days back too

Originally posted by: Rdigest

I didn't see this post earlier ❤️ this is exactly what I wish to see.

Originally posted by: sadiltl

bold. then why the monologues of her wanting to get back to him on single sorry. I have heard it multiple times. I am just saying writers are confused and making her look confused. If they want to take that route, it is okay, get audience convinced because it is morally not the right decision. If they can convince us, then well and good

You keep saying morality is tested when there is dilemma and it means trying to take a right decision when confronted with a situation...

So how is this confusion not a moral question... her heart wants Vik, her mind refuses.... thats the whole point of her dilemma...

Her mind knows he CA ed and she cannot forgive him... but her heart wants to...

Yahi to saara khel hai na... 🤷🏻‍♀️

Originally posted by: Saichintalli

but I don't know why, I think dua ke samne sach ane ka blame Pura vikranth ke upar ayega.... yashika and Malla might do something and everyone thinks vikranth did it..

Mujhe bhi lagta hai

Originally posted by: Moor278

You keep saying morality is tested when there is dilemma and it means trying to take a right decision when confronted with a situation...

So how is this confusion not a moral question... her heart wants Vik, her mind refuses.... thats the whole point of her dilemma...

Her mind knows he CA ed and she cannot forgive him... but her heart wants to...

Yahi to saara khel hai na... 🤷🏻‍♀️

Yes...but a moral person doesnt just think about herself. She thinks about a man who is tied to her kid. Invested his time and energy in them. She need not get back to him. No.

She has to ASK him, with care and concern, what his future is .... why he is wasting his time on them. If he is wasting or not...When will the conversation happen? When Vik says sorry and ask her to come to him? Independent of what life throws at her, how she thinks defines her morality.

There is no dilemma here, She SHOULD ask DK about his future plans. May be she is living with Vik's memories. DK knows it. However, can she assume DK is ok to lead a lonely life with NO memories of his own? She assumes he is a mahaan sanyasi, who can just live for his brother's dauther. Come on. It is NOT moral dilemma, it is minimum responsibility. If she is not doing it, she is not thinking right.

She has moral dilemma with Vik, I agree. I am not mixing those two. I am just saying she cannot compromise on DK and ditch him. I am not saying she will. I am just worried she will, given her monologues and how writers write.

She is not assuming.. its mutually agreed between DK Mannat and Ronnie.

And just for reference Mannat compares DK to Shruti who sacrificed her life for her sisters daughter.

https://x.com/semsmasems26463/status/2049199190501183840

Is it ViMal 2.0 in making?

Originally posted by: Moor278

She is not assuming.. its mutually agreed between DK Mannat and Ronnie.

And just for reference Mannat compares DK to Shruti who sacrificed her life for her sisters daughter.

OK i got the answer. So she assumes DK is like shruthi. So she knows Dua is important to DK, as important as she is to shruthi. Ok good. She will not go to vik, neither DK will marry anyone else. just parents to dua. Then it is good. i hope she doesnt fuel her thoughts of going back to Vik on one single sorry.