Dhurandhar 2 - The meltdown has begun - Page 41

Originally posted by: Cynical1

https://x.com/KreatelyMedia/status/2036873426778923129

the meltdown crowd knew what they would say but had to pay to watch the movie to have the meltdowns.

please don't do this. people like arfa , bhaskar .. they are in deep deep trouble. we all know wife beating is allowed in that religion. its such a misogynist cult and only these ladies know how they are managing.

Originally posted by: Krinya

I will vote for you in the next election . What an idea to stop fake currency from circulating !

Well, yes... in the context of the movie... but what are the true facts???

And doesn't Sorry_Bol has a valid point if t h a t really would have happend in r e a l i t y (which isn't the interest in everything the movie narrates)?

men beating their wives. pedophiles, murderers, adulterers exist in every society but a religion giving permission to do the above said is different.

some serious problem with that cult.

Originally posted by: Cynical1

Such a long post wasted on a meltdown. Dhurandhar is NOT about Hindu Muslim.

It’s a spy thriller against Pakistani terrorism.
Now try again.
I am Charlie Hebdo ❤️

bold: No, you're n o t ... you (mis-)use this slogan.

If one r e a l l y knows for what exactly this slogan stands, one knows what it means.

As I already stated: One has to read the French magazines Hara Kiri/Charlie Hebdo to know exactly for what they stand. If one knew their content one won't ursurp this slogan for what is expressed in many of the posts done by you.

Yes, the slogan stands for freedom of speech... however n o t for each kind of speech. If one asks Google (just for 'beginners') for what Charlie Hebdo stands one would get, e.g.:

"Charlie Hebdo is a French satirical weekly newspaper known for its staunch defense of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and secularism (laïcité). It is characterized by provocative, anti-religious, and political cartoons, often stirring controversy by mocking figures and doctrines from various religions and political movements." (bold by me)

Charlie Hebdo would do a satirical article about a regime that thinks that o n e religion has to be the foundation of an entire nation (which they did with e.g. politics based on Islam)... you know very well on what religion the current political system in India is based (which is n o t the fault of this recommendable progressive and humanity-oriented religion). The misuse done to force division on the Indian population is something that would the makers of Charlie Hebdo irk a lot.

Charlie Hebdo published a cartoon in April 2021 that satirized the Narendra Modi regime in India, particularly focusing on the government's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. (I bet, you didn't know t h a t).

Btw, it is a waste of time to answer to all the (alleged) "Beginner" who do the line to get attention by supporting what you try to peddle here.

The forum is neither a political one nor focussing on a special religious orientation. I accuse you of blatantly misusing it for whatever agenda.

Originally posted by: Clochette

Well, yes... in the context of the movie... but what are the true facts???

And doesn't Sorry_Bol has a valid point if t h a t really would have happend in r e a l i t y (which isn't the interest in everything the movie narrates)?

Are you an indian ? Were you in india at the time of demonetization? Nobody had any issue with it except minor inconveniences and sporadic incidents ...obviously those with loads of black money , those who funded terrorism in kashmir & NE , those who handled the terror networks , wanted to cripple indias economy with fake currency, had huge meltdowns..if you were not one of them you shouldn't be having a problem with it .

Demonitization is needed in all economies every 8-9 years ..post demonization , the digital transactions were encouraged which has taken the country by storm ..

There will be thousands of criticisms on india and its govt , for indian ppl , but no appreciation for the work being done ..anyone prioritizing their selfish interests over the love for their country will never understand .

Well, Krinya, even living 6000 km away, I can inform myself, right? It's not that India's demonitization was secretly done.

However, to be honest, I don't want to elaborate on this subject as deeply as it deserves... I just thought that the one member who questioned the ficitonal rendition had a valid point.

Originally posted by: Clochette

I like that you talk about democracy and I agree with you that the public should judge for themselves. I myself didn't talk about any propaganda refering to the movie as such, only to what gets chosen in this thread to ridicule adverse impressions/opinions. As I'm neither a 'lover' of what the Pakistani leading forces support in their country and the political narrative they peddle (be it private adversary endeavours like shown in Pathaan nor the supporting terrorist deads planned and done by Islamic criminals Pakistan harbours and/or send to India), I would call out Pakistan for that at any time.

However, what the new narrative does, happens in India without Pakistani support... it is a narrative peddled by forces inside India to further a divide... and t h a t, my love for India doesn't tolerate as I got a well crafted example in my own country. Hence my protests.

Every Indian government after the partition had to deal with the diversity of religious systems in India... they may have done blunders and mistakes, but there had been serious endeavours to de-escalate a divide between Indians on the reason of religion.

Unfortunately, often very crucial issus got forgotten to deal with - e.g. corruption and caste issues, betraying the own population about what "democracy" r e a l l y means. India has a constitution which not get followed respective to very important parts relative to human rights. That doesn't diminish my love for the country and its population but it is a serious issue since the British showed that they wanted to leave the country on its own... they never ever should have bowed down to extremist forces out of getting bored to deal with... they just escaped the responsability they so easily used to colonise a country that never asked to get colonised.

This is my first & last time ill reply to you coz I dont wish to engage in this particular topic..to each their own ..

I shared the same view as yours when i was young ...non violence , peace between communities , brotherhood , so on & so forth ..but more i delve deep into this topic I realized, the community whose allegiance lies with their religion & not india, till the time this is the reality , peace is a far fetched dream ..

all these years , india & hindus were passive abt this whole thing bec the govt in power played appeasement politics ..muslims are nothing but vote bank to them , they themselves give 2 hoots to their community , their well being & their people ....kindness & compassion is a two way street.....india is misconstrued as gandhi/ ahimsa country...."bhaay bin hoye na preet" ..in order to keep anti social anti national elements in check , Danda raj is needed ..we need it more bec we are "secular" & democratic..

now coming to solutions, there isnt any ..im not looking for one...this is one of the major blunders, a historical mistake like israel Palestine, Kashmir , north korea South Korea, & so on..These problems will exist till the time divides exist ..divides will exist till humanity exists ...

If Palestinian was originally inhabited by arabs n they must conquer their land bk from israel , bharat was always a land of Hindus..at least this point cannot be contested..

Originally posted by: snatch

please don't do this. people like arfa , bhaskar .. they are in deep deep trouble. we all know wife beating is allowed in that religion. its such a misogynist cult and only these ladies know how they are managing.

Swara seems to be managing quite well though

https://x.com/i/status/2036871612608503956

Edit - my bad it's an edited photo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Q8BPjDtS8I

Sorry if already posted ..

Is this also a propaganda ?