Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2: EDT #12 - Page 133

Originally posted by: luvumjht

What is with vrinda falling in every episode and angad catching her.

What do you bet ki Gomzi will be Samira’s saviour.

Originally posted by: averma1

What do you bet ki Gomzi will be Samira’s saviour.

I don't understood your question? Sorry?

I am saying Gautam will be leaving in a huff and will inadvertently catch the falling Samira thus becoming a saviour.

Originally posted by: Phir_Mohabbat

Nandini too i guess. She never knew her pati dev dated bhabhi as well

Originally posted by: Phir_Mohabbat

Nandini too i guess. She never knew her pati dev dated bhabhi as well

She did.

Originally posted by: EkPaheli

The word is absolutely bang on - Distortians, as that’s exactly what they are. Just because they don’t understand something or find it offensive or wrong for their own reasons they will say absolutely anything and justify their absurd ideas right from symbols they don’t like to the idea that women are born and can’t be made by chopping off manly parts no matter how much one wants to pretend.

I believe all our ancestors had a valid reason for anything and everything they came up with including the jewellery the women wore. They ranged from economic, practical to health reasons which they will conveniently ignore to justify their own beliefs.

They claim that men don’t wear these things so it’s forced patriarchy but it’s a load of BS.

From an evolutionary standpoint, men and women have developed differently physically, psychologically, socially and emotionally. The way we dress, what we eat, the languages we speak, read and write may change but some things never will.

Take a modern day lifestyle for example. Even now, in an era where we are not hunter gatherers as is believed today we were once by modern scientists and scholars the world over, can you deny it that even now women associate status symbols very strongly with what they can wear and carry be it branded clothes, bags, shoes, perfumes, makeup and articles of a personal nature including jewellery even if it’s a lone solitaire that they chose to sport to the kind of places they can flaunt their wealth in social settings. Women even now need to carry their status in terms of the way they look, dress and feel.

Men maybe absolutely loaded but you can find them wearing the most basic T-shirts and jeans with very practical shoes and a wallet that looks no different than the ones that they carried before or the ones carried by their fathers before them. They don’t tend to fixate on the styling never changing much or the colours being limited, somber and boring with no innovation since the invention of the modern day wallet barring one or two tweaks every couple of decades.

But show me a wealthy man who wouldn’t want to buy property, invest in assets, in gadgets and services that they find merit in. He may not care about his looks but if he’s buying cars, bikes or even horses, he would pamper them like his babies and give them the best. You can’t tell a well off man he shouldn’t invest in properties, automobiles and gadgets but wear better clothes, get some jewellery for himself and he will likely think you’re nuts, high or joking.

It’s 2026 and this is the case even now.

Go back a couple of centuries, maybe more than a millennia ago, think of a different era with a different lifestyle where men tended to either be kings, farmers, warriors, priests or doing chores of other kinds like potters, cobblers, artisans etc. while women tended to be inclined to be the homemakers.

Men would have to do the physical chores that could range from ploughing fields to literally going to wars; women would be at home to cook, clean, raise children. Now… tell me would it be practical to expect men to don jewellery in these times or women?

Men equated their status with immovable property and assets since the beginning of time and women were entrusted with the movable form of the same. The wealth a man accumulated would pass down from father to son - immovable wealth going to the sons who stayed in the same lineage. The wealth that can move would be distributed among the daughters who married into other families and the daughters who married into our own families and became bahus. Daughters left their lineages to establish ties elsewhere and created their families with their husbands. Sons were expected to stay and continue their lineage with their wives and have as many heirs as possible to ensure that the family lives on.

We equate women with Maa Lakshmi and she’s literally called Chanchala - literally the name means she who’s ever moving. Hence the wealth that women carried would be the sort that they could literally carry on themselves and move around.

It’s also why when times are good men buy jewellery for their wives and daughters, because they know that if tough times fall these can act as a sort of insurance for the family regardless of whether the men were themselves around for the same or not.

These idiots would malign everything but fail to understand that there are reasons for everything.

Let me give you one last example - do you know why Mehendi is applied to women before marriage across the Indian subcontinent? We follow the tradition even now but have forgotten its origins.

Mehendi is made from crushing the leaves of the Heena plant and in ancient times you had to do it with a mortar and pestle. Add the other things and you have your Mehendi ready.

Ever noticed how it’s always cool on the skin when applied? How it tends to darken overtime and smells absolutely divine? The darkening agents are also literally either cloves that are wrapped up in a bundle and heated until they can do their magic or the aromatic eucalyptus oil which tends to be soothing and relaxing or lime and sugar which are two ingredients that we use for making a fresh lime soda in summers?

The Mehendi has been scientifically proven to have ingredients that help calm our nerves by the herbs in them, the darkening agents help the same.

What does an anxious bride need more than anything? To calm her nerves - hence the Mehendi. Apply it to hands and legs, where most of our nerves are concentrated and use intricate, beautiful patterns to make the most of it and give it an aesthetic appearance while ensuring that the bride can sit in one spot for a long time without being distracted or jittery or anxious.


So… yeah, I wish people would stop listening to these absolute morons whose opinions are just garbage.

I deliberately used the word distortians here, and it is perfectly summer up.

Women generally prefer being looked classy and beautiful. Jwellery is a part of it and that's why I'm out tradition there are 16 sringar, Sindoor mangalsootra out of those is specifically for married women to showcase their completeness as a family woman (one might argue that a woman is still complete without marriage and I agree, it's a choice of the woman whether or not she has to marry, however a woman traditionally has been the owner of the home (whosoever the property is named after, but in our tradition, it's the woman who enters the new house first during Griha Pravesh. it's her hand prints that are taken on the walls of every room), traditionally a woman starts as a kid and ends as a matriarch of a family she started. Thus starting a new family unit with marriage takes her to a new level of completeness. These two symbols is just a reflection of that.

Do you guys know , in an area in present day Afghanistan a figurine of a woman was found dating to IVC times (nearly 2200BCE) and that figurine has a red line along the areas of its hairline

Just think how old the tradition of Sindoor is... I don't know how leaving cultural symbols make you modern.

Originally posted by: EkPaheli

Hmm another filler episode but it’s interesting that they’re choosing to focus on the fact that Karan and Damini dated once and were almost married if not for Gautam.

LMAO, the kids are in for a surprise and a shock.

Samaira’s concerns are valid but I wonder what kind of a therapist is she going to who can’t call her parents and talk to them about how their daughter is suffering courtesy of their arguments.

I wonder if Gautam will save Samaira at the last minute somehow.

I think Gautam will save Samaira. That's why he entered the area just in time. About Damini I said yesterday that the issues between Karan and Nandani could somehow be related to Damini, you never know. Aside the line they showed was Gautam saying he will torture Damini, will they show he really did that? They are missing the part that once married, Damini and Karan plotted against Viranis together..

But I don't understand why are they showing pre Karan entry scenes to show that Karan and Gautam had issues.

Karan was against the whole family then, and no one loved or prioritised Karan over Gautam. They should have shown post Karan's entry scenes when they actually had Karan being given importance over Gautam. like Shobha saying she will tie Rakhi to Karan first or Karan being asked to do the Ravan Dehen..

And it seems destruction of Karan's character has stared, Nandani says kabhi khud k alaawa kisi k baare me socho... OMG, Except Tulsi, Karan was the only one in the family who never thought about himself but only about others ...Now is he becoming the selfish oneb.

Originally posted by: graphicd96

Tulsi to mihir- tum dulhe nhi ho dulhe ke baap hi

Mihir- haa to ek zamane mein tha na dulha

Yes ab is zamane mein bhi banoge dulhe phir ek baar 😂

I think next shaadi Tulsi and Mihir ki hi hogi...

Because their divorce is finalized so they definitely have to marry again

Originally posted by: averma1

I am saying Gautam will be leaving in a huff and will inadvertently catch the falling Samira thus becoming a saviour.

I think that will happen for sure... But that would make Gautam kind of saviour to Karan and end this conflict...

I however wanted this Karan vs Gautam to go for 3-4 episodes(,I don't think they will have Hiten and Sumeet in the show for more than that)

Otherwise let Damini be the issue between them