today's episode was full of emotions for gomzi mihir and Tulsi and also for noina darling Khushi ke ansu aa gye uski aankho me jab judge ne divorce granted kiya tha 😡
TATTOO & CAKE 2.3
🖥 Screen detective game Season 2 || Unmask the Movie / Tv show || 🖥
Lets be Honest
I Love You Armaan
Coming Soon - Official Trailer - Dhurandhar The Revenge
HOLIKA DAHAN 3.3
Happy Holi- celebrity pictures /videos
today's episode was full of emotions for gomzi mihir and Tulsi and also for noina darling Khushi ke ansu aa gye uski aankho me jab judge ne divorce granted kiya tha 😡
[અવતરણ=એકપહેલી]
હા. સારા લોકો સંઘર્ષ કરે છે અને ક્યારેક ક્યારેય જીતી શકતા નથી. ખરાબ લોકો માટે બધું સરળ છે કારણ કે આ કળિયુગ છે.
[/અવતરણ]
Yes sidhe logon ko kuch asani se nhi milta chalak aur dogle logon ka hi zamana hai real life me
Originally posted by: EkPaheli
Yeah. Good people struggle and sometimes never win. Bad people have it easy because this is Kalyug.
It's not about Kaliyug. Even Tretayug, Ram has to fight his battle and Sita to suffer. And in Dwaparyug, Pandavas to fight for their right.
Kaliyug to ghor hi hai, sirf PR se chalti hai, narratives pe tikti hai, insan apni buddhi shakti bhi kho baith ta hai, sahi aur galat me confused rehta hai, and finally uss kahani pe believe karne laggta hai jise usse sunaya gaya hai.
Mihir is no different, he believed all those Noina created such as Nothing left in his marriage, Tulsi is against his decisions, Noina loves Mihir and ek din Mihir bhi usse pyar karega, Tulsi aur Mihir k beech divorce hona hi sahi hai, sabse badi baat he believed he had physical relationship with her😂 again he believed her. Never questioned his instincts nor tried to explain Tulsi, but became the puppet of Noina.
Coming to Tulsi, she believed Noina loves Mihir until today's episode, she believed Noina saying Mihir mujhse pyar karta hai and hum dono khush hai.
And the glasses both Mihir n Tulsi wore signfies this, they were looking at things from what is fed by Noina and behaving accordingly. Now it's time for them to look from their own eyes, intelligence and wisdom.
It's not about Kaliyug. Even Tretayug, Ram has to fight his battle and Sita to suffer. And in Dwaparyug, Pandavas to fight for their right.
Kaliyug to ghor hi hai, sirf PR se chalti hai, narratives pe tikti hai, insan apni buddhi shakti bhi kho baith ta hai, sahi aur galat me confused rehta hai, and finally uss kahani pe believe karne laggta hai jise usse sunaya gaya hai.
Mihir is no different, he believed all those Noina created such as Nothing left in his marriage, Tulsi is against his decisions, Noina loves Mihir and ek din Mihir bhi usse pyar karega, Tulsi aur Mihir k beech divorce hona hi sahi hai, sabse badi baat he believed he had physical relationship with her😂 again he believed her. Never questioned his instincts nor tried to explain Tulsi, but became the puppet of Noina.
Coming to Tulsi, she believed Noina loves Mihir until today's episode, she believed Noina saying Mihir mujhse pyar karta hai and hum dono khush hai.
And the glasses both Mihir n Tulsi wore signfies this, they were looking at things from what is fed by Noina and behaving accordingly. Now it's time for them to look from their own eyes, intelligence and wisdom.
The difference is in those yugs we knew good would win eventually. Here we have no such guarantees. Ironically this is the shortest yug of them all but feels like chaos all the time. Back then even if things went wrong with you, the kind of people who were around would stay with you - be it parents, siblings, spouse and children. Now you don’t know if anyone can be trusted. There are parents who don’t deserve to have a child. There are children who don’t deserve good parents. There are siblings who would literally kill you for land and gold or money. There are spouses who would cheat on you in a heartbeat then kill you without remorse for someone else - be it a husband or a wife these days.
Originally posted by: EkPaheli
The difference is in those yugs we knew good would win eventually. Here we have no such guarantees. Ironically this is the shortest yug of them all but feels like chaos all the time. Back then even if things went wrong with you, the kind of people who were around would stay with you - be it parents, siblings, spouse and children. Now you don’t know if anyone can be trusted. There are parents who don’t deserve to have a child. There are children who don’t deserve good parents. There are siblings who would literally kill you for land and gold or money. There are spouses who would cheat on you in a heartbeat then kill you without remorse for someone else - be it a husband or a wife these days.
Yes is zamane kuch keh nhi sakte kon kis pal rang badal de ha Smriti aka Tulsi ka hi example de do usne apne dost ka hi pati chhin liya
Originally posted by: Namikfan123
Yes is zamane kuch keh nhi sakte kon kis pal rang badal de ha Smriti aka Tulsi ka hi example de do usne apne dost ka hi pati chhin liya
Not to sound defensive but I think it’s a bit too simplistic to say that she was the one who stole her friend’s husband. The guy was a family friend, literally in his 40s when they got married and she was in her early to mid twenties. The families knew each other quite well and hence she stayed at their home when she came to Mumbai looking for work.
If this were all 20 somethings people, she could be easily blamed for her friend’s marriage breaking up and being a home wrecker. But the man she married knew her since she was likely a child or at least a teenager. He’s got at least 15 years on her.
So why would we assume that she was the one who broke the marriage and not that she got groomed by a man who was trusted by her family enough to keep her safe. How do we presume that a 20 something girl would be a home wrecker but absolve the man who would cheat on his wife with someone half their age and more importantly someone they have known since she was much younger.
I think it’s easy to blame women but men owe accountability to their wives too. Even if she was a rotten person who tried to seduce him, why did he cheat? That’s on him entirely. If she was the seducer, why did he get seduced?
If she is evil then she should have been exposed or will be exposed, truth comes out someday somehow after all. It came out for Rupali Ganguly and she’s not even an active politician but simply a TV actress who joined a political party. Smriti’s a two time cabinet minister and if such dirty laundry existed on her, our media would have made sure it was out there especially when BJP wasn’t even in power and particularly when she was up against Rahul Gandhi in Amethi. Congress can get its people to strip at a global AI summit in Delhi to put a blotch on an event that’s going to impact our country positively, they would have never spared Smriti for this and hit her below the belt. The fact that even they never went there nor his ex wife and daughter ever say anything against Smriti has to mean something.
She’s been in BJP since the early 2000s while she was still playing Tulsi; she’s completed 2 decades in politics and TV industry; on her way to completing the third in a couple of years. This was too big a thing to stay hidden and buried for so long. So I think we shouldn’t character assassinate someone just because. If she’s wrong, she will be exposed someday… no matter how good she’s at keeping the lid on her dirty laundry. But let’s not field accusations against someone until we have more evidence of her guilt than mere assumptions based on some facts.
Originally posted by: EkPaheli
Not to sound defensive but I think it’s a bit too simplistic to say that she was the one who stole her friend’s husband. The guy was a family friend, literally in his 40s when they got married and she was in her early to mid twenties. The families knew each other quite well and hence she stayed at their home when she came to Mumbai looking for work.
If this were all 20 somethings people, she could be easily blamed for her friend’s marriage breaking up and being a home wrecker. But the man she married knew her since she was likely a child or at least a teenager. He’s got at least 15 years on her.
So why would we assume that she was the one who broke the marriage and not that she got groomed by a man who was trusted by her family enough to keep her safe. How do we presume that a 20 something girl would be a home wrecker but absolve the man who would cheat on his wife with someone half their age and more importantly someone they have known since she was much younger.
I think it’s easy to blame women but men owe accountability to their wives too. Even if she was a rotten person who tried to seduce him, why did he cheat? That’s on him entirely. If she was the seducer, why did he get seduced?
If she is evil then she should have been exposed or will be exposed, truth comes out someday somehow after all. It came out for Rupali Ganguly and she’s not even an active politician but simply a TV actress who joined a political party. Smriti’s a two time cabinet minister and if such dirty laundry existed on her, our media would have made sure it was out there especially when BJP wasn’t even in power and particularly when she was up against Rahul Gandhi in Amethi. Congress can get its people to strip at a global AI summit in Delhi to put a blotch on an event that’s going to impact our country positively, they would have never spared Smriti for this and hit her below the belt. The fact that even they never went there nor his ex wife and daughter ever say anything against Smriti has to mean something.She’s been in BJP since the early 2000s while she was still playing Tulsi; she’s completed 2 decades in politics and TV industry; on her way to completing the third in a couple of years. This was too big a thing to stay hidden and buried for so long. So I think we shouldn’t character assassinate someone just because. If she’s wrong, she will be exposed someday… no matter how good she’s at keeping the lid on her dirty laundry. But let’s not field accusations against someone until we have more evidence of her guilt than mere assumptions based on some facts.
Maybe you are right but I was just giving example of not trusting people blindly if that person is your real sibling
Originally posted by: EkPaheli
The difference is in those yugs we knew good would win eventually. Here we have no such guarantees. Ironically this is the shortest yug of them all but feels like chaos all the time. Back then even if things went wrong with you, the kind of people who were around would stay with you - be it parents, siblings, spouse and children. Now you don’t know if anyone can be trusted. There are parents who don’t deserve to have a child. There are children who don’t deserve good parents. There are siblings who would literally kill you for land and gold or money. There are spouses who would cheat on you in a heartbeat then kill you without remorse for someone else - be it a husband or a wife these days.
That's bcoz we started appreciating things from their outer look, assess people by their clothes, financial status and power.
We forgot the very core of our culture and value system in order to prove modern, open minded, secular, intellect, self sufficient, individual and watching crap like Ekta stories😂😂.
And our education system is to be blamed for this, earlier Gurukul system taught both vidya and buddhi, not degree certificates sitting in an air-conditioning rooms. Gurukul taught both physical and mental stability imparting wisdom, harmony among human beings, animals and be as part of nature hand in hand, not to destroy for our own selfish motives. That is why indians worshipped river, mountain, tree, animals etc way to show gratitude.
We have to look backwards and learn a lot, rediscover our ownself and try to find the answers for coexistence, which definitely is missing among human beings.
Sorry, off topic..
That's bcoz we started appreciating things from their outer look, assess people by their clothes, financial status and power.
We forgot the very core of our culture and value system in order to prove modern, open minded, secular, intellect, self sufficient, individual and watching crap like Ekta stories😂😂.
And our education system is to be blamed for this, earlier Gurukul system taught both vidya and buddhi, not degree certificates sitting in an air-conditioning rooms. Gurukul taught both physical and mental stability imparting wisdom, harmony among human beings, animals and be as part of nature hand in hand, not to destroy for our own selfish motives. That is why indians worshipped river, mountain, tree, animals etc way to show gratitude.
We have to look backwards and learn a lot, rediscover our ownself and try to find the answers for coexistence, which definitely is missing among human beings.
Sorry, off topic..
Ya, you are telling right zamana badal jata hai
Age kya pata iss se bi bura waqt dekhna mile?
Originally posted by: Namikfan123
Maybe you are right but I was just giving example of not trusting people blindly if that person is your real sibling
Yep trust is not an option today, especially blind trust.
Hello folks , Welcome to the Episode Discussion Thread for Kyunki Saas bhi kabhi bahu thi 2. Please keep these Rules in mind while posting....
Hello folks , Welcome to the Episode Discussion Thread for Kyunki Saas bhi kabhi bahu thi 2. Please keep these Rules in mind while posting....
Hello folks , Welcome to the Episode Discussion Thread for Kyunki Saas bhi kabhi bahu thi 2. Please keep these Rules in mind while posting....
Hello folks , Welcome to the Episode Discussion Thread for Kyunki Saas bhi kabhi bahu thi 2. Please keep these Rules in mind while posting....
Hello folks , Welcome to the Episode Discussion Thread for Kyunki Saas bhi kabhi bahu thi 2. Please keep these Rules in mind while posting....
1.5k