Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2: EDT #8 - Page 125

Originally posted by: BangBang_Shilpa

Last 2 episodes boring.

Yet to watch.

Yeah. They want TuHir together but also don’t want Tulsi back home yet and so we’re getting this random wedding track with these filler episodes.

I would have rather seen them have TuHir interacting at that exhibition/competition. Could have rather brought back Ajay as was teased than whatever this detour is.

That random guy in Kutch who met Tulsi on behalf of his boss to offer her that huge order/partnership deal could have simply turned up again and introduced Ajay as his boss. Ajay would help Tulsi expand her business while he definitely wouldn’t mind competing with the rest of the Viranis.

At this point I am willing to take Maharaj Ji weeping as he reunites with Munni than these random people who have no relevance to the story and show.

Originally posted by: BangBang_Shilpa

Last 2 episodes boring.

Yet to watch.

Originally posted by: EkPaheli

She sold other people’s houses?! How?!

So uski friend was chalu and a MLA and she got the NOC of allowing redevelopment of chawl by upma dhoke se

Friend manipulated upma mata

Originally posted by: A_Star39

arre the chawl wale people na gave their Power of attorney to Upma.

So uski friend was chalu and a MLA and she got the NOC of allowing redevelopment of chawl by upma dhoke se

Friend manipulated upma mata

These writers really ought to touch grass sometimes. Do they even realise this is not 1950/60’s anymore? The evil zameendaar plots are not gonna work if they are shown even in big budget Bollywood movies set in the present era if they use this dumb plot even if the PH gets all three Khans for the first time in the same movie somehow.

They’re not stealing candy from a baby but actually going for a demolition. To do this they need to show more than some documents signed by someone with the power of attorney. They need to show that either the original owners of the properties were paid off the amount that’s fair market value and provide proofs of the same in print aka bank transfers via cheques/DD/RTGS/NEFT for each single person so that not a single person can file a lawsuit against them in the future stalling their project. Or they need to show proof that the original inhabitants have agreed to shift somewhere else for the project to happen and a timeline is supposed to be mentioned which states everything from demolition to reconstruction of the new building/s that would be built on the same land. Furthermore, the developers would have to mention that they are providing a minimum amount of extra space to the original homes when they provide the homes to the original owners in the new buildings after the construction is complete. Beyond this, the builders and the land owners have to sign an agreement wherein it’s clearly stated that the builder will pay them a one time moving fee set for a fixed range, a year’s worth of rent so they may move into their new premises and then the builder will increase the amount paid for rent by 5-10 percent with each successive year. When it’s all done the builder will provide them with moving fees AGAIN but this time for moving back into their newly constructed homes and this will also be paid for one time aka bring however many trucks/tempos of movers that are needed in one go. Don’t keep on moving your stuff in instalments and expect the builder to pay for each time. If you get a moving company to do that job for more than one time then you’ll have to pay them out of your own pocket.

AND all of this takes years to get settled! Beyond this the original owners are not just kicked out of their homes as bulldozers arrive to demolish their homes, they’re given at least a year to relocate.

This is just drama for the sake of drama.

Also even if Onupama has a friend who is a politician, there are always MULTIPLE politicians interested in getting their share of cut in land deals. No one politician can get things done so easily here. It’s not a dictatorship where if Kim Jong Un decides likes your property, you move out amicably or get moved out of this world forcibly.

I was forced to watch basically as Anupamaa eats into kyunki slot making Kyunki start at irregular times.

Anupamaa signing papers was dragged for two weeks lol

Originally posted by: BangBang_Shilpa

I was forced to watch basically as Anupamaa eats into kyunki slot making Kyunki start at irregular times.

Anupamaa signing papers was dragged for two weeks lol

Here’s hoping 2026 brings an end to this show and the collective misery it brings everyone.

Not some builders, ALL of them are required to pay for your rent for the duration of the construction. Unless you sell your property to them, you will be paid. It’s the law.

As for BMC elections, people might dream but they can’t influence voters with such shows.

Originally posted by: EkPaheli

Not some builders, ALL of them are required to pay for your rent for the duration of the construction. Unless you sell your property to them, you will be paid. It’s the law.

As for BMC elections, people might dream but they can’t influence voters with such shows.

Originally posted by: A_Star39

literally idiocity is airing right now on ITV in name of feminism

This isn’t even feminism. Feminism was about women getting treated as equal human beings - allowed to work, wear what they want, marry whom they want, have kids or not, vote, open bank accounts, own properties, get their share in inheritance, be allowed to study in streams that were denied them simply on the basis of their gender though mental acuity has nothing to do with what our gender, race, religion or sexuality is.

This is literally heroine worship. In movies it is hero worship, on TV it is the women who are on a pedestal whether they deserve to be there or not just like their male counterparts.

The problem is because when men do this they’re loud, abrasive, brash and aggressive, not to mention they have to be shown smoking, drinking, cussing amongst other things. People talk a them and they are called out. But when women do the same thing albeit slightly differently, it’s not the same treatment for them.

Just look at a trailer of an upcoming movie that’s been talked about a lot. Paid PR is hyping it up because it’s unfortunate for that movie which happens to have taken 4-5 years to make, that it’s gonna clash with a behemoth that’s got expectations riding higher than Baahubali 2 did in the form of Dhurandhar 2 courtesy of its record creating first part which still refuses to slow down. Had that poor movie been directed by a man who is infamous for making such movies, say the likes of Vanga but since a woman has directed it, it’s not being given the belt treatment it deserves. This happens when a woman is the protagonist and the man is the director too. Look at Gangubai. How many people did you find accusing Bhatt and Bhansali of glorifying a literal trafficker? Show a guy in a similar role who ends up also becoming a social worker/politician while also being a trafficker in one of the most infamous red light districts of our country and I bet people would want to flay them alive and be unapologetic about it too.

In the name of gender equality, we have unfortunately adopted a different form of gender based bias and blindness which is unfortunate for both mediums of mass entertainment be it movies or TV shows.