Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2: EDT # 7 [DT NOTE PAGE 7] - Page 17

Originally posted by: AninditaB

I don't know if you like Parth character (as for nostalgia because the character is inconsistent in appearing) or actor as the actor can't act, nor he has screenspace.

If Rohit had played Parth, then Parth-Vrinda could have been considered, but in this season both Parth as an actor and character has no substance

i am aying audience would supprt parth more than angad as 2nd lead with better male actor playing it and bring more trps and make show less dependent on mihir tulsi

yes this parth is more side actor than lead

but if they had taken great actors like shaheer, abrar qazi etc in role of parth imagine the story and chemistry between parth and fl and parth and tulsi would lit up the screen just like karan tulsi in Kyunki 1

does ekta have no good ITV male leads to take in even big show like kyunki

instead of flooding kyunki with kiran, hemant, suchi, mitali, hrithik, mummi, angad etc just bring one great second male lead as parth would have raised tp automatically

pair parth with that orphanage lead girl or vrinda and there you have a great pair too

parth could have taken karan place in tulsi life and taken care of business

if i am writer i only will keep pari as anupam daughter and parth grows up with tulsi when his parents are abroad and thus make him male lead

no angad, hrithik, suchu, vrinda etc etc waste of screen space they are boring characters

a great second male lead can fetch as much trp as 10 charcaters who just do nothing much in scenes or story

Originally posted by: AninditaB

I don't know if you like Parth character (as for nostalgia because the character is inconsistent in appearing) or actor as the actor can't act, nor he has screenspace.

If Rohit had played Parth, then Parth-Vrinda could have been considered, but in this season both Parth as an actor and character has no substance

Parth actor has zero screen presence.

They should've casted a better looking actor for this role.

Originally posted by: myviewprem

i a aying audience would supprt parth more than angad as 2nd lead with better male actor

yes this parth is more side actor than lead

but if they had taken great actors like shaheer, abrar qazi etc in role of parth imagine the story and chemistry between parth and fl and parth and tulsi would lit up the screen just like karan tulsi in Kyunki 1

Problem with this show as some have mentioned is the new gen girls are beautiful and act well but the new gen boys are either bad, mediocre or okayish at best. They need to get good male actors for the new gen

Originally posted by: FaguniUpadhyay

If makers wanted to make Parth as important or lead character they would have casted someone like that only , they obviously knew that he is supposed to play Karan Nandini’s son right

Unfortunately Karan and Tanya's son this season 😪

Originally posted by: myviewprem

i am aying audience would supprt parth more than angad as 2nd lead with better male actor playing it and bring more trps and make show less dependent on mihir tulsi

yes this parth is more side actor than lead

but if they had taken great actors like shaheer, abrar qazi etc in role of parth imagine the story and chemistry between parth and fl and parth and tulsi would lit up the screen just like karan tulsi in Kyunki 1

does ekta have no good ITV male leads to take in even big show like kyunki

instead of flooding kyunki with kiran, hemant, suchi, mitali, hrithik, mummi, angad etc just bring one great second male lead as parth would have raised tp automatically

pair parth with that orphanage lead girl or vrinda and there you have a great pair too

parth could have taken karan place in tulsi life and taken care of business

if i am writer i only will keep pari as anupam daughter and parth grows up with tulsi when his parents are abroad and thus make him male lead

no angad, hrithik, suchu, vrinda etc etc waste of screen space they are boring characters

a great second male lead can fetch as much trp as 10 charcaters who just do nothing much in scenes or story

Also Vrinda is married to Angad now. So it’s best she remains with him

Originally posted by: The_Best

I don’t think Vrinda should or can be paired opposite Parth. The actress is good to look at and playing her role well, but her acting in previous show was bad. So I think she’s only capable to do simple scenes best and not capable to do more. But Vaishnavi I have heard from all who watched her previous work is that she’s a very good actress

Originally posted by: BangBang_Shilpa

I really appreciate your detailed analysis.

It's perfection. You summed up everything.

Ome thing I don't understand how did Vrinda's kids saw Tulsi !!

Did they see her on tv or how's it possible Tulsi in Kutch meeting them in person.

Thank you ☺️

My hunch is that Akshay and Madhvi saw Tulsi online. Some social media platform perhaps. Remember post leap we see that little girl, probably 12 or so shooting videos on her phone. I recalled that scene later, at the time of the episode even I was baffled.

Then I remembered this scene. Akshay Madhavi probably had someone’s phone and were scrolling Instagram or something else where they come across this girl’s account and spot Tulsi in one of her reels. Tulsi asked her to delete those videos, but are kids ever that obedient anywhere? Tulsi may not even be in the main frame but in the BG where these kids noticed her. Or maybe someone made a video of Tulsi confronting that guy and his family for asking dowry and prompting Aarti to call off the wedding. That’s another guess.

Originally posted by: FaguniUpadhyay

The character Parth is a side character and the actor playing the part has no screen presence to yeah it’s good if the new girl is paired opposite to him only

Ekta if wanted could have casted a better actor for Parth for cashing nostalgic sentiment. If she hadn't done or hadn't made Parth's character main, there must be some reason