Dhurandhar reviews and box office - 550 crores India, 850 crore Global - Page 115

Originally posted by: elaichichai

This is 3 days old. It has crossed 850 crores gross by now and will enter 1000cr gross club by Xmas. Please update your thread title too to reflect gross collection and nett collection clearly.

https://x.com/i/status/2002699216129523790

Originally posted by: priya185

thanks if needed please let me know the new figures with a URL from a credible source

Yeah I think we can quote the producer figures for now. This is the latest gross update from Jio. Just mention 870 cr as overseas gross, the 579 is domestic nett

https://x.com/i/status/2002993474191466857

Oh, dears, I can understand your exitation, I even - in parts - feel the same... but please, too, (from my side): don't over value numbers and, also, write Akshaye's name in the right way (or do you think, it would be okay to write Ranveer's name as Ranver??? (or - accidently - as Ranbeer???) - each time I read Akshaye's name written as "Akshay", I find it disrespective regardless of the praise the one writes...

Originally posted by: Clochette

Oh, dears, I can understand your exitation, I even - in parts - feel the same... but please, too, (from my side): don't over value numbers and, also, write Akshaye's name in the right way (or do you think, it would be okay to write Ranveer's name as Ranver??? (or - accidently - as Ranbeer???) - each time I read Akshaye's name written as "Akshay", I find it disrespective regardless of the praise the one writes...

Who is over valuing numbers? Every film's producer figures are the ones which are ultimately considered as the final source in these grosser lists cause different websites quote different numbers. We cannot use the numbers of a website you like or trust just cause you want it. For relative comparison atp producer numbers seem most apt and not like this is a film where we need to worry about over valuation when it is clearly heading towards all time records organically and everyone in trade unanimously agrees on that!!!

Regarding your grouse about how Akshaye's name is mis-spelled you should tag those individuals.

https://x.com/i/status/2003051804750483703

https://x.com/i/status/2003118502035808300

Originally posted by: Clochette

You only can see the open support and praise, right? What would we know about the private one? Also, there may be reasons (we don't know) why those you mentioned didn't write anything on social media about the movie...

Thats the whole point lol why not praise in public whats stopping them…that round table with anupama where folks are mentioning every movie other than the elephant in the room explains everything…they just cant see that their fake narratives in their movies are no longer working for the common people…im actually glad these folks have shown their true colors by keeping quiet…jealous, mafia supporters, egoist etc

Originally posted by: oyebollywood

https://x.com/barfiiverse/status/1996808510403961206

Just going back and reading these gems....avoided them like plague when they were posted...but now they are fun to read......it's hilarious to see how hard the haters tried to destroy a movie without even watching it....

Fake review....Ranveer Singh is there for 45 mnts? Wow....how could these people sleep after floating such blatant lies trying to destroy a movie which has so many lives depending on it?

Ok this is funny i had to actually confirm online if it was true and not a joke

https://x.com/i/status/2002987288092176660

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/dhurandhar-rahul-gandhi-credited-as-executive-producer-in-ranveer-singh-starrer-netizens-react-ahead-of-first-look-release-with-param-sundari/articleshow/123558140.cms

Nothing in my post was targeted to you, dear, but it was a more general comment aimed at all those to whom it may have concerned.

550 crore Indian rupies today aren't the same as they had been 2 years ago... they are worth less now than what they had been worth then... that's why I think that boxoffice numbers are relative... one should not - imo - take the Bahubali 2 numbers and compare them - without respecting the inflation - with Dhurandhar's number (valid equally for every other movies which are years apart)... it is logical that ticket prices got raised...

Originally posted by: Clochette

Nothing in my post was targeted to you, dear, but it was a more general comment aimed at all those to whom it may have concerned.

550 crore Indian rupies today aren't the same as they had been 2 years ago... they are worth less now than what they had been worth then... that's why I think that boxoffice numbers are relative... one should not - imo - take the Bahubali 2 numbers and compare them - without respecting the inflation - with Dhurandhar's number (valid equally for every other movies which are years apart)... it is logical that ticket prices got raised...

By that logic no movie's box office should ever be discussed then since every film has undergone inflationary effect. Also in the past 3-4 years the levels of inflation are not so drastic to make the data incomparable. Were you to use that argument for Mughal e Azam or Sholay, I would understand but films released in the past 5 years are fairly recent and barely show any major impact of inflation to disallow comparability with films released this year!!