Ranveer Singh surpasses Ranbir Kapoor

Acting no but definitely bigger hit

Originally posted by: mz.gigglez

Acting no but definitely bigger hit

In acting toh Ranveer surpassed him ages ago but you can have your opinion on that.

Originally posted by: mz.gigglez

Acting no but definitely bigger hit

hes very good actor

watch his khilji or baji roa or lootera movies or gully boy or kapil dev

he becomes character than staying ranveer singh

ranbir remains ranibir everywhere

daddy issue wala boy man ranbir which hes in real life too

Arre hatao isko....He surpassed him long time back in terms of acting, versatility and filmography....PR PR khelne se truth cannot be pushed under the rug for long....With such a beast of an actor, no dirty PR can stop him from succeeding....The truth is in front of everyone to see....He has the most enviable filmography, more blockbusters in India, more blockbusters overseas than anyone else from his generation....Enough said!

Dhurandhar didn't prove anything new...It just reiterated what Ranveer has already proven time and again...ek do movies kya nahi chili, isko mujrim kharaar kar diya gaya like as if he was caught being serial killer or something....

Right now the only thing I want to know is, when is this 19th March 2026 coming?

.

Originally posted by: mz.gigglez

Acting no but definitely bigger hit

If you want to call playing an angsty manchild with daddy issues, finding himself again and again and again as acting....ha bhai...Ranveer ko maaf hi kardo....

Aditya Dhar > Vanga, honestly.

Better writing, better intent, and a male-led story without demeaning women. Animal worked on nudity (not even violence), dhurandhar worked on craft.

And there ranveer vs ranbir is not even a debate.

Ranbir is not versatile, bro have lost his whatever looks he had. Animal was not a display of his craft or starpower. It felt like him playing an unchecked version of himself, powered by fantasy masculinity rather than performance.

While dhurandhar is also not a display of ranveer's starpower but it for sure shows his acting prowess. Hamsa is fundamentally different from Ranveer Singh, and for 3.5 hours you don’t see the star, you see the character. You feel him, sit with him, and that’s the mark of real performance.

Originally posted by: Romanoger

Aditya Dhar > Vanga, honestly.

Better writing, better intent, and a male-led story without demeaning women. Animal worked on nudity (not even violence), dhurandhar worked on craft.

And there ranveer vs ranbir is not even a debate.

Ranbir is not versatile, bro have lost his whatever looks he had. Animal was not a display of his craft or starpower. It felt like him playing an unchecked version of himself, powered by fantasy masculinity rather than performance.

While dhurandhar is also not a display of ranveer's starpower but it for sure shows his acting prowess. Hamsa is fundamentally different from Ranveer Singh, and for 3.5 hours you don’t see the star, you see the character. You feel him, sit with him, and that’s the mark of real performance.

I agree...Both the movies are essentially what they are because of their directors...

However, who do you think would've taken the fall if ,God forbid , the movie was a flop? Just so that you know, there were obituaries being written for Ranveer's career even before the movie was released calling it a disaster and a wannabe Animal and what not and that his career is all but finished and now he can only do the OTT content as a supporting actor.....Not the director, not the other supporting cast....

Sample this:

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/bollywood/5378583/my-box-office-predictions-for-dhurandhar

Ranveer looks so handsome in that photo wow

Ranbir looks like his friend sandeep vanga.