Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 31st Oct 2025
Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 1st Nov 2025 - WKV
IJJAT PYARI 31.10
🏏India tour of Australia, 2025: AUS vs IND,2nd T20I, Melbourne🏏
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Nov 1, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
BEIJJATI AT PEAKS 1.11
Deepika Alia Atlee Ranveer Janhvi Aryan-Halloween costume Ambani party
Angad marries Vrinda ; Mihir & Tulsi ka rishta khatam!
Mitali scene clip : Pret Aatma / Dimaagi bimari
Anu maid is back 💃 💃 💃 💃 💃 💃 💃
SRK Film Festival SRK Mania
🏏A Nation With Billion Dreams, Best Wishes to Our Women in Blue🏏
Sushant’s sister has lost her mind completely!
Which November release excites you the most?
˗ˏˋ ★ Pick Your Team! (Teams Feature) ★ ˎˊ˗
♕ Go Go Page Rangers🏆┇Nov BTRC 2K25 ♕
What if............Arjun
| BOOKCHESTER UNITED ⚽️ 📖 | Nov’ 25 BTRC | 🍂🍁
Tottenpage Hotspurs Nov 2025
Originally posted by: A_Star39
just because Tanya is a Bansal and Kajal is a daughter?
By that logic Abhinav is damad of goenkas and his children abhira and abhir shouldnt have gotten even a penny from goenka empire and estate.Naira and Kartik ki legacy ka bhi haq nahi dono ko.Kairav ka haq hai woh.If in story kairav and muskans daughter comes into the picture and she starts asserting her haq on Akshara dance academy and the legacy and property then what kind of uproar it will bring?
Manish had included ruhi and abhira in the property but not kairav and muskans kids.
Kya partiality hai
Morality wise maybe tanya krish they don't deserve a penny
But are you trying to tell me Sanjay phuphasa don't have any stake in firm? Agar uska sell hogya or maybe overtake he will get a good money
And if we are talking about morality wise, a couple /family section who has no stability, couldn't manage their finance enough that they are living on streets, their son ran away with a baby years back - aise family na hi hi business deserve krti hai na kuch
The reply is like beti ki shadi krdi so she don't have any rights... Nope married /unmarried girls have equal stakes in property. Kajal can go to court and get her share, that should be 1/3rd iirc, madhav Manoj and herself. Arman and bageera gets just the share of madhav. And if Sanjay phuphasa has lawyer stake he gets the business.. basically half property goes to bansals
better not chat when pov differ that's what I said. Did I tell you to agree or accept what I said. Because the discussion won't stop or come to a conclusion it's better 🤗. Loving or hating ruhi is not the main issue now. Ruhi is mocked kicked by us or we more than anyone.Originally posted by: Rosh4rose
Now you expect me to agree everything it is not chatting na?
For that we must record own words and listen back
I loved only Ruhi she is not there rest all of them are alike .
I don't hate or like any one on particuler but totally dislike " Krish" but not the actor ...
Actually shivani was the legal bahu and wife not vidya,she was married to Madhav first, she was not divorced also she didn't fought for her right,had she done it after returning vidya must have to back off as per court orders,and how come arman is illegal because he is Shivani's son as because his nd she was not accepted by poddar s only and not by Indian penal code,he is also son of madhav-the eldest son and child of poddars and by that logic Maira and kiara is also legal heiress until they are poddar with kaajal is married now and she is bansal, just because she is living here that doesn't mean she and her children will get equal rights , her maayka, and though Sanjay fufa used to run Poddar firm,it was only for poddars as dadaji established it and meant for his sons their sons only,fufa was just a caretaker only as madhav is on other profession,manoj was not so eligible,dadi was not any lawyer and her grandchildren were all minors then
Shivani was missing for years. She's legally dead. Vidya might be illegal wife but arman is legitimate like you said
The firm is only for poddars was a line said by kaveri. When the property went to Krish it showed us that line has no value. And Sanjay has been a lawyer to to firm, taking decision along with kaveri arman. So he should have a claim legally. It's like how suits serial used to have naming partner. I imagine phuphasa will have something like that
Krish tanya gets right simply because of kajal. She gets equal share of property. Arman gets only madhavs share. If kaveri don't give kajal her share she's in her rights to file a case and get money. There are so many stories around us, when properties are divided married sisters gets their rights too. I think that's as per Hindu laws or something or maybe property law
Heiress is only as per father/mother's lineage. Again Kiara gets Manoj's share. If tomorrow my father's family divides their property, through my father I get that share. There is no individual share for me
Originally posted by: Mehersudha
better not chat when pov differ that's what I said. Did I tell you to agree or accept what I said. Because the discussion won't stop or come to a conclusion it's better 🤗. Loving or hating ruhi is not the main issue now. Ruhi is mocked kicked by us or we more than anyone.
Okay...
....chill this is an ITV drama
Anyways now let us wait for tomorrows story ....Conclusion for today ...
Ye kartik ki life mein kitni girls thi 😆ak bilkul baap jaisa damad choose karke gayi heh 🤣jaha jata heh ek ladki ko leke aata heh 😂🤣
same drama she said before but when fights started she kept uppp ummm . She will take. It's like ar giving poddars shares to abheera thru dadi then dadi was compelled to give. Now she is giving happily in her gratitude. Abheera has earned that love and respect from dadi. But she should not show Tanya or ruhi or others less. Its her biasedness always that drives fights.Originally posted by: viji2111
Did kuch nahi chahiye wali Abhira accept the property papers or not??
If dadi gave vidya kajal similar gifts why not give equal gifts to kiara Tanya and abheera. My mil fil has given necklaces to all grand daughters equally when they are grown up. from grand kids birth till now beta or beti bahu or beti , beta or damad it's all same same any day. It's similar in my parents house too. We never asked anything. Bday or marriage day or kids gifts anything till now same same for betis bahu, grandson or daughter or damad or son. If people show that partiality then only fights start so why as parents initiate that.
Waise arohi ki beti getting money uska kya relation hai poddars se lol
Yeah arohis beti got and akthus beti too so point kya hai 🤣
that's what why unnecessary rift for itv drama🤗.Originally posted by: Rosh4rose
Okay...
....chill this is an ITV drama
Anyways now let us wait for tomorrows story ....Conclusion for today ...
Originally posted by: Phir_Mohabbat
Morality wise maybe tanya krish they don't deserve a penny
But are you trying to tell me Sanjay phuphasa don't have any stake in firm? Agar uska sell hogya or maybe overtake he will get a good money
And if we are talking about morality wise, a couple /family section who has no stability, couldn't manage their finance enough that they are living on streets, their son ran away with a baby years back - aise family na hi hi business deserve krti hai na kuch
The reply is like beti ki shadi krdi so she don't have any rights... Nope married /unmarried girls have equal stakes in property. Kajal can go to court and get her share, that should be 1/3rd iirc, madhav Manoj and herself. Arman and bageera gets just the share of madhav. And if Sanjay phuphasa has lawyer stake he gets the business.. basically half property goes to bansals
Yaa
Every one has equal share in the property but Bhansals should go to court and file case it will be interesting to watch .
Hopefully Pupha might do that now...There is no point now he is reformed man ...