she is involved in deaths she didn't kill. That's shown. Another version is assumed manyu wanted nav to die or motive Is that. You can say manyu is involved in nav death but proved innocent. Because that's shown. Kairav was hooked in anisha death proved innocent. Neil's death was never referred as she is involved in that responsible for that deaths. Narrative is that. Did they ever say thru arohi or manjari or anyone that they were wrong or shown a proof on ak as innocent. Never. When abhimanyu told after that best father son function , last time too in zidd you didn't listen ak was angry she asked you didn't forget it. Did ak ever accepted she did wrong instead she defended herself in that issue. Ruhi is equally responsible in arohi death .Ak went away unable to face situations or make anyone understand but told truth to manyu that day. Ruhi started car but doesn't know, ak entered running car doesn't control it. So both are involved it's not only ak or ruhi alone.They cleared it. Manyu was cleared in all charges by ak herself her first case as lawyer. Muski goenkas didn't let him to operate orelse he could have survived. Ak hit her head on just heart operated babaji so he died immediately. So who is responsible. For me they all killed him in bits 🤣🤣 bahut maja kiye cvsOriginally posted by: Indira1211
yes but in the story they also said akshu didn't cause anybodys deaths. It was accidents and neil was killled by goons. But people say she was responsible..so people can also say manyu wanted abhinav dead.
0