Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki: Episode Discussion Thread - 19 - Page 61

Sonia to ARS ka spin-off chahiye

These guys are on damage control spree ...so many interviews of Adnan and Ayesha ...the duo is chaotic in real....love them yaar....

Originally posted by: Shemer

I think there will more drama and twist on the wedding day..

She said something about the track ?

Its a short live, saved on her page. Dont know what she said, had my audio off. But there was script on the table, anyone interested with eagle eyed can decode it

Originally posted by: Moor278

Lets not get into nitty gritties of ITV marriages....

They twist concepts and rituals as they desire...

ITV is known for physics defying sindoor rasms and spent the night together so get married kind of concepts

Here ManVik are married symbolically and ViMal are married too... kaise aur kitna episode will tell us... as per Abeers IV.. except sindoor none of the other rasms like phere or varmala happened..

So if the makers want... they can easily come up and say shaadi puri nahi hui... Or Mannat can claim the blood as sindoor and declare ViMal void ... any of these is possible...

Whats wrong however and instead should be discussed is how Malla trapped Vik into this marriage.... if the genders were reversed there would have been havoc and people would have claimed the female was forced and its not a real marriage etc ...

just because its a male who is trapped this time doesnt mean the marriage should be considered sanctimonious ... this too is like a forced marriage situation where nobody took his consent into consideration. (as per updates and some IVs)

Bold- That’s what I said man! Malla trapped him with false allegations and he married her because his family threatened him. Nobody asked him his consent. Completely agree on gender reversal. Malla should also get punished for trapping and for false allegations against an innocent guy🤬

Originally posted by: truptishree

But Mannat changed the pills right?

He should get FB when poor fellow will come out of this shock.

I hope this time we will get more insight of his past 🤞

Originally posted by: Moor278

Lets not get into nitty gritties of ITV marriages....

They twist concepts and rituals as they desire...

ITV is known for physics defying sindoor rasms and spent the night together so get married kind of concepts

Here ManVik are married symbolically and ViMal are married too... kaise aur kitna episode will tell us... as per Abeers IV.. except sindoor none of the other rasms like phere or varmala happened..

So if the makers want... they can easily come up and say shaadi puri nahi hui... Or Mannat can claim the blood as sindoor and declare ViMal void ... any of these is possible...

Whats wrong however and instead should be discussed is how Malla trapped Vik into this marriage.... if the genders were reversed there would have been havoc and people would have claimed the female was forced and its not a real marriage etc ...

just because its a male who is trapped this time doesnt mean the marriage should be considered sanctimonious ... this too is like a forced marriage situation where nobody took his consent into consideration. (as per updates and some IVs)

Originally posted by: Aadi04

Keep on justifying EMA

why was it wrong for Pakhi Di ..

so many heroes in serials get married forcefully.. when it is FL it is right when it is PL wrong ..

Yeh kya logic logic hai

Mannat Di if she encourages Vikrant is another version of pakhi Di

I am not watching only because I don't want to see mannath and vikranth as virat and pakhi....

But irrespective of mannath, if virat want to get away from malla... There is no wrong , infact I should do it... That's what I am saying....

After that if manvik get married ,whats wrong in that

Originally posted by: MeeraWrites

Her Sonia Khanna swag is unmatchable.

Remember the scene where she became a lioness and threatens Bobby.

One of my most favourites of Sonia Khanna urf ARS is her lock-picking scene with that dialogue..."kitne taale khole hain.."

Originally posted by: Moor278

bold...

You are repeating the same thing again and again....

'IF' Mannat encourages and thats an 'IF' .... please call it an EMA... but be sure to call out Vikrant too.... not just Mannat....

Stop blaming a woman when she has not done anything of the sort yet and if it does happen call out the man too as he is also equally responsible!!!!

No one is justifying an EMA here... the main reason why everyone is upset is precisely this... that Vikrant is now married and it would look tainted even in future...

Bobby ko meri taraf se