YRKKH BTS, SM updates & Spoilers Thread #68 - Page 48

Originally posted by: -cynicalmess-

Such cringe after that sajan ji ghar aaye kaand🥴🥴🥴.

Originally posted by: Indira1211

bhagoda rohit is a loser just like that chudail wife of his.. we’ll see how they handle baby Daksh. I hope Daksh isn’t hurt in the process ☹️

I dont have hope on their parenting skills at all.. Roohi will definitely put Daksh in danger because of her carelessness and will blame anyone else.. Daksh won’t be safe with her..

Originally posted by: Sparkle232

I watched the show enough. If any negative or non lead character decided to abort a baby because of 7:year old kid's tantrums then surely that character would have received different names. Thanks for proving my point in my previous post though.

Ab yahan koi negative character abort karne nahi gayi hai to bash that character.then why you saying this now?Also you said daughter fans will defend AK?it will only happen ,if you purposefully drag AK out of nowhere like this?Now gen 3 is done and dusted .Aaj Abhira uski mommy ki history bhi pata chali.Now there won't be much about it also in the show.Then phirse again Ak,manyu ,nav?what s the purpose bringing this now.In BTS thread ,it's actually rarely get discussed.When there is Abhira ,Armaan ,Ruhi ,Rohit to get accused blamed,phir wahi same ak and her story.

Originally posted by: Sparkle232

I will re-watch the scene again. My point was this narrative of manyu was obsessed lover that's why jr akshara had to agree to marry him. If he was really that bad, he would have never tried to stop the abortion.

A mother getting ready to abort the kid to please another kid's tantrums is indefensible just like how a woman driving in her 9 months pregnancy makes her bad mother to many. To each their own.

If you want to defend a Gen 4 Ruhi ,why you need to drag a gen 3 AK into it,when gen 4 is running now?You can't defend Ruhi otherwise?If AK is wrong ,Ruhi's wrong won't be right.

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Why did I read this in that song wala tone 😭😭😭😂

May be cause I was doing the same while posting too we all love Rajaan after all

Originally posted by: Sparkle232

I watched the show enough. If any negative or non lead character decided to abort a baby because of 7:year old kid's tantrums then surely that character would have received different names. Thanks for proving my point in my previous post though.

And you think Akshara was not bashed or blamed? She was raked through coal on this very forum for her actions. Either try to find out what happened before or don't make sweeping statements that mock entire fandom without head or tail.

Originally posted by: Sparkle232

I will re-watch the scene again. My point was this narrative of manyu was obsessed lover that's why jr akshara had to agree to marry him. If he was really that bad, he would have never tried to stop the abortion.

A mother getting ready to abort the kid to please another kid's tantrums is indefensible just like how a woman driving in her 9 months pregnancy makes her bad mother to many. To each their own.

He wanted Akshu in any way posdible… he proposed her when he knew abhir was Abhinav and Akshu ka beta… he knew Akshu will never b with him… if in any case she abortef the baby… as it was his mom who brought Akshu to that stage…

Woh itna hadd tak Akshu ka saath chahte tha ki he left his mom in that age!!!! Woh mom jiske liye he called his dad Sir…

Makers left nothing yo imagination ki Manyu could do anything to stay with Akshu!!

Originally posted by: janecastle

That's what happens when people read what's written by fans on SM and not actually watch the show. Abhir was in hospital and Akshara was under tremendous pressure. She reached the clinic in a daze. Manyu had nothing to do with it. She made the choice to keep her baby herself because she could not do that to the last memory of her husband.

Originally posted by: Sparkle232

Show track is about gen 3. You guys can discuss how characterless sirat and arohi are. But other can't do the same. What's with this gate keeping? Give the same gyaan to the posts in this same thread where sirat, arohi were discussed.

Actually here the one mostly get bashed from previous generations is AK only .Arohi and sirat is rarely get mentioned.And you accusing me to say that?I rarely do gatekeeping yeah this time I tried .becoz this forum is getting too much toxic just because of this gen 3 discussion

Originally posted by: elizamerin

If you want to defend a Gen 4 Ruhi ,why you need to drag a gen 3 AK into it,when gen 4 is running now?You can't defend Ruhi otherwise?If AK is wrong ,Ruhi's wrong won't be right.

I don't need to defend ruhi. She is "vamp" who is not supposed to be saint. People who claim ruhi is bad mother defend Jr akshara for being great mother just for obvious reasons. So let's not talk about bringing one character to defend others narrative when the reaction to two characters are different here. Just scroll through the thread where you can find discussions on abimanyu, sirat, arohi. Apply same rule while discussing them.