ABHIR the SOLO - Page 82

Originally posted by: Bibliophiles

What about Abhim's son?? He left becz he was being separated from his son all over again, his child being taken once again due to Akshara & Goenka's feud after Aarohi's death?
So, he should have left his son in suffering like that- in misery, with no roof on his head, homeless, penniless, in poverty, bearing the brunt of hardship, struggle,& not be his son's support system becz that time pregnant Akshara too had to start from scratches in a new town & her career too wasn't stabilized. After all, it is both Mother & Father's duty to take care of the well-being of their child & protect their child from misery & sufferings. Abhimanyu too left to protect his child from misery. Ruhi still had warmth of a big family, all the basic facilities & warmth of a roof on her head.

Bacche pe sirff Maa ka hi haq hai kya?? fathers have no importance in a child's life or what??

So, Stay happy with your own definition of PATHETIC.....I prefer not repeating same things & rectifying everybody's opinion continuously. That's not my job. You're entitled to your own opinion.

to ab grieving brother ka kya hua??😂

ya ir ab he knew that akshu was not a weak woman in his love...and so he cannot manipulate her...😂 iss liye..maaaaaaa ko bhi chod diya...😂

and he hated his father as his father treated his mom badly....did he tewll his son what he had done with him and his mom...and y and how did he leave his mom??😂 did he tell that ur mom tried to tell me about u...but i was in my ego...

mein apne papa ko sir bulata tha...junior...aap to mujhe kuch bhi na bulao..as i maried ur mom for love..and left her in the worst possible way ata worst possible manner...😂

bhai sab golmaal hai..iss manyu ka..[LOl] pathetic character....and makers bhi pachta rahe hain ise bana kar....bilkul gayab kar diya hai ise...😂

Originally posted by: Sneha.Narayanan

That could be your opinion but according to the show , He was the kindest person.

But I appreciate that your bashing is limited to character, and not the actor. So you are entitled to give your opinion

One serious question What according to you, defines the truth in a story? What is according to the show exactly? Is it the first person’s perspective, the second person’s, or the narrator’s account? When you follow a show, do you take everything the narrator or a character says at face value, or do you analyze the events and form your own conclusions based on what you’ve seen and understood?

I do the later. For me XYZ person coming and saying i am a acha admi doesn't make him one.

For example, according to the show then would you really believe the latest narrative that Abhimanyu and Aarohi were married, and Aarohi only later discovered Neil being his brother, simply because Manish recently said so?

For what i know and follow is that storytelling is inherently subjective, requiring us to question and evaluate rather than accept every narrative at face value.

Originally posted by: India_TV

please read the context...agar aate ho beech mein to padh kar aao...

there was no reference of kasauli and paying guest....bas aa jaate ho aise hi...😂padho and then come with ur arguments...if u have any...😂

LOL!!! ROFL!! Look, at the way you're tweaking & distorting my comments. It's hilarious

Arrey bhai, Aapne ek question kiya tha- Kis haq se ghar pe ruka tha?? Toh it's clear do ghar ko hi imply kiya gaya thaToh maine reply diya ki- kis haq se dono ghar me ruka tha.

Toh context padhne ki baat aap mujhse na hi kare toh accha hai. It's noice, when losing the argument & no substantial points left to contribute in debate- just talk about any random things & talk about changing the context. I won't like to involve myself in this argument any further.. End of the debate. Peace out!!!

Originally posted by: Bibliophiles

LOL!!! ROFL!! Look, the way you're tweaking & distorting my comments. It's hilarious

Arrey bhai, Aapne ek question kiya tha- Kis haq se ghar pe ruka tha?? Toh ghar to Kasauli wale ghar ko imply kiya gaya thaToh maine reply diya ki kis haq se ruka tha.

Toh context padhne ki baat aap mujhse na hi kare toh accha hai. I won't like to involve myself in this argument any further..End of the debate. Peace out!!!

wohi na....maine koi kasauli imply nahi kiya...kuch imply hi nahi kiya....openly and clearly baa ho rahi thi...ki kis ghar ki baat kar rahe the...aap padh lo...itminaan se..and then reply..😂 no hurries...😂

Originally posted by: India_TV

to ab grieving brother ka kya hua??😂

ya ir ab he knew that akshu was not a weak woman in his love...and so he cannot manipulate her...😂 iss liye..maaaaaaa ko bhi chod diya...😂

and he hated his father as his father treated his mom badly....did he tewll his son what he had done with him and his mom...and y and how did he leave his mom??😂 did he tell that ur mom tried to tell me about u...but i was in my ego...

mein apne papa ko sir bulata tha...junior...aap to mujhe kuch bhi na bulao..as i maried ur mom for love..and left her in the worst possible way ata worst possible manner...😂

bhai sab golmaal hai..iss manyu ka..[LOl] pathetic character....and makers bhi pachta rahe hain ise bana kar....bilkul gayab kar diya hai ise...😂

Toh apne brother keliye grieve or mourning nahi kiya kyaa wo or was he merrily celebrating after his brother's death. Ya phir apni mother & niece ka take care nahi kiya itne saalon takk

The fact is- both his niece Ruhi & mother most importantly had a roof on their head & a family to take care. But his own son had to wander around and struggle hard for a roof on their head & bread & butter. So, he thought to be their support system & lessen their sufferings

Originally posted by: Bibliophiles

Toh apne brother keliye grieve or mourning nahi kiya kyaa wo or was he merrily celebrating then. Ya phir apni mother & niece ka take care nahi kiya

The fact is- both his niece Ruhi & mother most importantly had a roof on their head & a family to take care. But his own son had to wander around and struggle hard for a roof on their head & bread & butter. So, he thought to be their support system & lessen their sufferings

bilkul nahi kiya...maaaaa ko chod diya.....ruhi koc hod diya....and bhai ki last wsh to pata nahi kahan gaye...😂

he thot that akshu is weak..kahan jaayegi...gidgidaate hue mere paas hi aayegi...but she did not come...and he pleaded...still did not come..😂...so he left everyone to b with her...

yeh mat bolna ki bete ke liye gaya...as makers ne clearly dikhaya ki he proposed her...when he did not know that he was biod dad of abhir..

he was a total matlabi xharacter...a otal pathetic one...jo apne papa ko hi sir bulata ho...and then does even worse iwth his wife..and then leaves the mon for that woman...matlab....😂

Abhimanyu was not pathetic. He was a good human being. He was a good doctor. He was not jealous. He was not revengeful.

Regarding Roohi he always planned to come back. He was in contact with Goenkas and asked Akshara to do the same and not break the relations but Akshara wanted them to contact her. He always planned to come back but died within month of leaving Roohi.

Suhasini Goenka loved Akshara so much and supported her always. She made sure that Akshara doesn't leave alone this time and asked Abhimanyu to accompany her. Akshara never tried to contact her also.

I wonder why muskan who claimed to love her bhaiji the most abandoned Akshara like this??

Originally posted by: Bibliophiles

I've read & very well getting the context.....Professional ho ya personal life he had enough in his plate. He was a loving father, a son, a brother, etc. etc.( doesn't matter if people deny his rights of a bio father, but they can't change the fact he was the legit father of Abhir, it's a fact) He had most of the relations in his hand. Toh relations koi dur ki baat nahi thi uskeliye. Being single & divorcee is not a crime or shouldn't be a taboo.

He was a doctor, but he was a human too, he was still made of blood & flesh & not of stone & a lifeless soul, will he have endless tolerance capacity for all foolishness, doesn't matter if his beloved family members were casualties of the foolish & impatient decision of his wife, even if his wife took a suicidal decision of taking Neil & herself to traffickers, doesn't matter if his wife risk the life of his family, time & again, ... Anyways, when a person is mourning the death of his loved ones & suffered huge loss, they're not in their right frame of mind. We can't really judge actions of a grieving person, if we aren't there in their shoes. What about empathy for a mother & brother jinka pura ka pura ek 26-27 saal ka young son/brother marr gaya , masoom Akshu ke masoom decisions wajah se, aur logg sanity & rationality ki baat karrahe. Kya socha tha Akshu ne human trafficking wale gundon ke paas jaayenge, toh zinda bachkar vapas aayenge. kya socha tha usne, nobody will make her accountable for the loss

I see great hue & cry for miscarried Akshu & the miscarried foetus, who had not even developed senses by that time in the womb. let alone being born, in fact the child was very much alive, but what about 26 y/o grown up young aadmi's death, there were so many memories associated with him, that will haunt his close ones forever, uske life ki koi kimat nahi thi, bass Akshu ki hi dard ki kimat hai, his death is so underwhelming that it it won't get any strong reaction. His death stands nowhere in front of great Akshu or what. Only FL lives matter or what. Magnitude of both the losses can't be equaled. Magnitude & intensity of losing a grown up is very very different... .

Not just his profession was noble, even he did noble deeds of saving lives and was an ethical doctor. It wasn't like he was a corrupted doctor, that made him a pathetic human. Even, if he had a failed marriage, he had very efficiently maintained all his relations& taken all the responsibilities towards other relations in his life, even took the responsibility of his ex in-laws in someone's absence. He was a very protective brother, son, uncle, B-I-L & even husband till the time he was. Anyways, divorcing isn't a crime, he might have hurried & way was different, but he was a grieving brother, not in his right frame of mind to make a rational decision. He was a grieving brother, but never a pathetic human

You perfectly described everything logically and humanely. But the fact that FL life matters, as you mentioned, has taken the prominance in this situation to blame Abhimanyu.

Since Akshara was miscarried nothing else mattered. Her situation was important Abhimanyu ought to understand that the loss happened due to an accident which Akshara did unknowinly to help the needy children. The fact that decision and action which created this incidential situation doesn't matter at all. Neil and unborn twin's death were casualties but nothing could be helped since it was an accident. Abhimanyu should've supressed his grief for his brother at any cost since Akshara's miscarriage was more hurtful. It might be highly emotional situation but Abhimanyu should've controlled and understood since he was a doctor (apprently doctors are god). So divorce was a sin in this situation. Therefore he should be cancelled. This is the kind of mindset they have.

So because of this sin, Akshara had the full authority given by fans to gaslight and exploit Abhimanyu. Every action she did was justified because he divorced her when she had a miscarriage.

Ironically, she was a music therapist who was supposed to understad individuals and their mind. Therapists are the professionals who can heal mental scars of others. What did she do? She didn't reflect on her actions positively and disaster that she cause and nor did she move on from the phone call due to which she hated Abhimanyu, despite of the fact that 6 years passed her hatred and hostility towards ex-husband didn't change. On the other hand, even though Abhi couldn't also move on from Neil's death he never hated Akshara for what she did. He had that reflection of his action and empathy. This is why Akshara could gaslight and insult him. He let her do that. So yes as a doctor he was a sensible character. But we can't say the same for Akshara the therapist. Yet No FL fans pointed out her career because she was hurt and in pain.

Originally posted by: viji2111

Abhimanyu was not pathetic. He was a good human being. He was a good doctor. He was not jealous. He was not revengeful.

Regarding Roohi he always planned to come back. He was in contact with Goenkas and asked Akshara to do the same and not break the relations but Akshara wanted them to contact her. He always planned to come back but died within month of leaving Roohi.

Suhasini Goenka loved Akshara so much and supported her always. She made sure that Akshara doesn't leave alone this time and asked Abhimanyu to accompany her. Akshara never tried to contact her also.

I wonder why muskan who claimed to love her bhaiji the most abandoned Akshara like this??

@bold are you questioning Kasuali people tauba tauba 😭😭

Originally posted by: chaipaani

Abhimanyu Goenka ki daughters ki first choice. Uske liye Goenka sisters ladai kutai bhi karte the. Both were dying to be with him Pre Post and Post Post leap. Basically all the time.

Basically bechare ko Ek baar muh pe and then 2 times on call Ak the great ko I reject kra then she was like my ego is hurt bacha father swap revenge.

Otherwise she was like chila lo par rahungi tumhari hi.

Nav ji ko pati haq k liye Manyu ko Aaru se engagement krni padi wrna bechare sukha saakha jeevan bita rahe the complaining to Neelama and Muskaan who were like hum kya kare agar nahi de rahi haq toh 🤣

Itna sach nahi bolte Mickey 😂😂😂

Ouija ke pass koi aur ladki nahi the...there was literally no one who came after him...who in the right mind would come after a person who roamed around with a empty photo frame (eww) . Roh roh ke pati haq manga and woh Akshara Sharma ne dediya...finally usko tata bye bye bhi kar diya. Only pappi to not know the existence of legachee beti.