Originally posted by: Sukorameni
What have I conveniently forgotten .I have pretty much Replied to every response of yours .You had very clearly highlighted how I was a beginner and did not get my facts correct so I pretty much responded why I wasn't and honestly if this would have been so problematic then there would have been protests across everywhere and probably even fir filed that the moral sentiments of some person/community is hurt .But as far as I remember nothing like that happened .I remember there was a fir filed during ghum 1 during surrogacy and pehradar Piya ki was taken off air because it had clearly hurt social sentiments and don't get me started on how fluidic things like sexuality was in India and things that were accepted in this country just a 1000 years would ,today will probably break people's head .That's why I said how things regarding morality has changed in this country in the last 2000 years.There is a controversy and fir filed in this country every minute for hurting religious and social sentiments and if the teacher student thing would have been so bothersome to society clearly there would have some response from somewhere . Hence I have not ignored anything I pretty much responded to .You might consider something ethical and others might disagree .And it's not about Making something look cool .When two consenting adults are in a relationship who happen to be teacher and student , honestly it's their personal choice .
Read para 2 of my reply to yours on pg.51, regarding why people would have been late in expressing their displeasure & disapproval.
I have written both sides of story in short & still there are several detailed sides to it, but I didn't elaborate that point more, in an online argument.
As a precaution, I clearly mentioned in the brackets too, regarding which specific bit I was talking about & not implying the whole conversation. But you didn’t see that surely, and still needed elaboration. Precautionary note must be read , to know better about the context
Oh gosh! I have to explain it like a kid, even after mentioning it in brackets
A significantly huge chunk of people, don’t watch ITV at all, or don’t watch ITV anymore, or have shifted to other platforms for entertainment, they’re clueless about the mindless happenings, so they care less about ITV to engage in protests. Also, majority members of Ghum forum left post S1’s ending. Anyways, maximum people know what ITV is capable of, so they expect no better, they don’t invest their energy in protesting against ITV any more, until they've crossed all the limits
Hence, it’s not right to conclude anything about this topic, with a small sample survey size of IF members & twitteratis. We still can’t be sure about majority’s opinion
Just because I shared a different opinion than the majority in IF, do I deserve being grilled & should the matter be stretched like a rubber band. And, do I need to give AGNIPARIKSHA for my statements & clarify to this extent ?? as if it’s a court proceeding going on.
I kindly request you to not stretch it anymore, and let’s respectfully agree to disagree. To each its own. PEACE, please

🤭
🤭& chop-chop skills lajawaab👌🏻
Got held up at work but I wanted to reply to you properly as I really enjoyed your analysis.
Creatives get inspiration from others' work all the time and then incorporate their own ideas which adds a fresh flavor. Just because they are following YHM, it doesn't mean they have to copy scene by scene and keep the negativity intact. One of my biggest issues with YHM has always been Raman's unhealthy obsession with Adi. There was a Bengali remake of YHM. Although it wasn't that good acting wise, they actually didn't force the FL's motherhood on the ML's boy and eventually he realized the error of his ways and reunited with his family. I would very much want such deviation in Ghum.
But I want to believe that it's more than just Mahanta. She wants Rajat's connection to end with his ex, where her presence or absence doesn't elicit any type of reaction from him.
1.7k