WRITTEN UPDATES AND DAILY DISCUSSION # 132| DT NOTE P 42 - Page 130

Just a little example..

Today I saw a scene in ghum where Savi asks Rajat to come to the elocution competition on time to which Rajat responds rudely. But this same scene played out very differently in yhm..In yhm, it was a comedy scene with Raman and Ishita bickering.

So yes eventhough it is copy paste, ghum writers aren't able to execute it properly. Or may be this is something which is intentional. In yhm by this phase, there was a sense of ease between both Raman and Ishita..they had this "constant bickering and annoying each other" kinda dynamic which isn't there in ghum.

Originally posted by: Nephy1

No, I don't think its the issue of chemistry, hitesh-bhavika also had fire chemistry..

Its the issue of direction and screenplay...

Like rajat-savi scenes are rushed while raman-ishita scene had a thehraav, build up...

Lets take example of this rain hug confession..

Here in ghum, they were fighting and suddenly rajat hugged savi, focus was on savi's face..

But in yhm, focus was on raman's face when ishita was saying her part, there was subtle changes in his body language and expressions, and there was slow moving of his towards ishita and than hug and than after 1 min. , he said ILU..

But all this happened in ghum in jet speed...

So issue is definetly not chemistry as I said...

Its screenplay and direction.

I mean obviously its not easy to match KP in acting, some people are natural but hitesh is not bad, maybe not as teriific as KP but he had a lot of experience so issue isn't with either bhavika or hitesh neither chemistry between them, ghum hit a jackpot infact in that matter but they should havechanged their direction team also...

Screenplay n direction is a let off here but I don’t find chemistry btw the leads here that good too..Bhavika has same expressions in every scene but Hitesh Amyra scenes r good..Problem is that yhm story isn't made for ghum..Also yhm took time in building the relationship btw ishra which ganja definitely didn't took n showed everything on jet speed which also ruined the basic essence of the show..

Originally posted by: Manny_123

What is MATSH? This is what happens when makers drag the show for a long time. With the time, the show loses its charm and TRP stays stagnant or decreases. All shows between 2.0-2.3 are lucky cuz overall viewership has gone down in SP. They seem to be okay with it. Now 1.7 is best for Rangu. This will further go down in the future as TV will become less important for new TRP audience. I think they shoukd consider producing finite shows now.

" Meri aashiqui tum se hi " one Ekha show by Shakthi & Radhika Madan .....It was ko colours ...I think ..I never used to watch " Sithara shows "...First try on Sithara was Ghum1 here I am still suffering ...Watched Ristha 3 on and off along with it

Originally posted by: Sparkle232

Rajat tho hey hi toxic as addressed in the show itself ( which is good thing)

If it's about og "non toxic ml" who is just a human with flaws then yes this disclaimer is very much needed.

Non toxic ML doesn't exist on ITV ...No one cam beat Viraat in toxicity ..Ishaaan was another ....So this being Ghum 3 toxicity will be 3 times bigger

Seriously ...which angle Savi and Rajath look like parents of Kian ...

Originally posted by: Sparkle232

This is going very petty. Let me put it straight.

When revamp started rajat introduced as a person who loved his daughter since "beginning". His reaction to the slap by savi is completely different to the og. There are other instances too where he acted more problematic than og. Anyone who watch the show will want their ml to not do problematic stuff that the og version did. As far as I seen there are statements like rajat shouldn't behave toxic like og ml ( og ml might not be toxic to you but not the same for others). It doesn't mean he is not toxic. It was just generic wish from a viewer. If rajat indeed acts toxic ( he did act) he will obviously get called toxic. No ghum 3 viewer saying rajat is not toxic & only og ml is atleast in the forum. So I don't get this obsession to prove same thing daily.

Calling a ml toxic doesn't mean he is not loved. I honestly don't get this extreme defense.

I have seen ghum 3 lead actors getting called mid even that kid amaira is not spared. It's ok. It's a opinion.

But atleast make seperate thread to discuss og show or to diss this copy paste show.

Because it's getting difficult to have healthy discussions in such messed up thread. Enjoy your og show and let others enjoy their copy paste show.

Tagging you guys as I just wanna let you all know too.

So true

What to do fans think they have the " right " to defend fictional characters which even the creators don't care and actors moved on .

Originally posted by: Manny_123

Nowadays shows are bakwas. This is why I watch K -dramas. They are short series and some have good plots. From the category itself we can understand whether it will be toxic or not

Shows were bakwas from the beginning that is why it is called soap with no values or essence in it

Now audience have more options " Korean shows & Web serials have better content ",

ITV is running this shows just to entertain 🙄 TRP gang's can't expect much from TV shows it is tailored to satisfy certain audience.

Originally posted by: Golimumab

Just a little example..

Today I saw a scene in ghum where Savi asks Rajat to come to the elocution competition on time to which Rajat responds rudely. But this same scene played out very differently in yhm..In yhm, it was a comedy scene with Raman and Ishita bickering.

So yes eventhough it is copy paste, ghum writers aren't able to execute it properly. Or may be this is something which is intentional. In yhm by this phase, there was a sense of ease between both Raman and Ishita..they had this "constant bickering and annoying each other" kinda dynamic which isn't there in ghum.

Originally posted by: Rosh4rose

Non toxic ML doesn't exist on ITV ...No one cam beat Viraat in toxicity ..Ishaaan was another ....So this being Ghum 3 toxicity will be 3 times bigger

Seriously ...which angle Savi and Rajath look like parents of Kian ...

Sooraj from Diya was not toxic..he is the greenest flag that I know. I heard Naitik was also one of them. So there was a time softie MLs could pull off audience. Presently most audience loves pendulum and toxic MLs .

Originally posted by: Golimumab

Just a little example..

Today I saw a scene in ghum where Savi asks Rajat to come to the elocution competition on time to which Rajat responds rudely. But this same scene played out very differently in yhm..In yhm, it was a comedy scene with Raman and Ishita bickering.

So yes eventhough it is copy paste, ghum writers aren't able to execute it properly. Or may be this is something which is intentional. In yhm by this phase, there was a sense of ease between both Raman and Ishita..they had this "constant bickering and annoying each other" kinda dynamic which isn't there in ghum.

Ghum makers are intentionally making Rajat rude in the situations where it not necessary in order to add the drama value but it falls flat and doesn't make any sense. I loved IshRa's banters in this phase. In fact Ghum makers did this initially but now they are unnecessarily adding fights between the lead. They got TRP pressure I think. This is what lazy writers and producers can do instead of thinking a way to fix the story.

Originally posted by: Rosh4rose

" Meri aashiqui tum se hi " one Ekha show by Shakthi & Radhika Madan .....It was ko colours ...I think ..I never used to watch " Sithara shows "...First try on Sithara was Ghum1 here I am still suffering ...Watched Ristha 3 on and off along with it

Oh I have watched that show on and off before. Yeah it aired on Colors. I watched serials on TV on and off.

Colors bring unique shows but cuz of TRP they make everything bigamy in the end