Originally posted by: Adiandsid
To me its more about how 'believable' the character is - good/bad, strong/weak - and that depends on both the actor and the script. A character is strong if written and acted well. [Bhavani is weak... but she is believable most of the time and has a good screen presence.] Chitnis family is more believable than tha Ahujas.
All characters - Abhi, Pragya, Virat, Amruta - have flaws. But how believable are they? Both Abhi and Pragya have been more believable than V and A... and it has to do with how the characters are written, and what the actors can add on to it.
Perhaps a good parallel is Pragya as the business woman in the initial eps of the 2 yr leap. It was believable she is a shrewd businesswoman now - though they went overboard with 'businessperson of the year' there too, which I could ignore. Her business interactions were shown adding to the believability. But of course, like always, they make her dumb when it comes to Alia and Tanu... so that the plot can move ahead.
Virat's intro was about showing off the money he has... and it will be more believable if he goes bankrupt soon.
Virat's scene of throwing money was a major disappointment in the earlier episode. It's not behavior fitting for a businessman of the year...Virat came off more like a spoiled brat.


now with much increased screen time.
also cooking in kitchen, sharing her abuser & violator Virat's bedroom,
uttering helpless dialogues of 'I have to stay 1 year for divorce'..


that too mostly wasting Sriti's histrionics in nonsensical scenes & plots.
along with

and me after her episode air:
330