Kango gets slapped (DT Note pg 8) - Page 30

Originally posted by: Haila_tu

Kangana baja hai kahin door....khann, khann, khann

https://twitter.com/MohdWaseemINC/status/1798770746845696103

Kangana se jyada to kuchh aur hee baj raha hai.

I just want to know say something to all the people condemning violence here. I hope your principles were consistent when Kangana called for genocide both against Muslims and farmers (who were not just Sikhs). Instigation of violence is also not protected by freedom of speech under most constitutions. I know for a fact that the US Constitution would not protect it. Especially if the figure in question influences society to a point her followers on social media would listen to her or do what she told them. She got away with the law in those instances. Thus, the principles should be consistent here. A slap to one person is far less dangerous than calling for genocide or the process of eradication (I think that was the exact wording she used) against the many.

She also had zero empathy for the Palestinians being slaughtered. Yet, a slap to her is criminal.

https://x.com/befittingfacts/status/1798710588987908222?s=46&t=raeISQ_GJHRQslUoibooOw

Originally posted by: anonymouse1

https://x.com/isaifpatel/status/1798742804283404705

Log yahan lady constable ko Kha_tani bol rahe, but jab Chetan Singh ne 4 logon ko unke religion se hate ke karan maar diya tha, tab Hindutva Terrorist nhi bola? gazab ki hypocrisy hai.

Sudhanshu Adhikari, ek Sikh Police officer ko Kha_tani bola, jabki vo apni duty kar raha tha, that's BJ Party/RSS ppl, jo logon ko unke religion ke base par differentiate karke hatred spread karte hain.

For them everyone is terrorist except them🤣

At least muslims n Sikhs accept terrorism exists in their religion. They don't even accept their religion too has terrorists.

They don't even leave their SC/ST community n call them anti-national if they don't support their RW agenda...

https://x.com/indic_god/status/1798729840230797720?s=46&t=raeISQ_GJHRQslUoibooOw

Originally posted by: Grumpydwarf24

I just want to know say something to all the people condemning violence here. I hope your principles were consistent when Kangana called for genocide both against Muslims and farmers (who were not just Sikhs). Instigation of violence is also not protected by freedom of speech under most constitutions. I know for a fact that the US Constitution would not protect it. Especially if the figure in question influences society to a point her followers on social media would listen to her or do what she was told. She got away with the law in those instances. Thus, the principles should be consistent here. A slap to one person is far less dangerous than calling for a genocide or the process of eradication (I think was the exact wording she used) against the many.

She also had zero empathy for the Palestinians being slaughtered. Yet, a slap to her is criminal.

Also when she incited violence against West Bengal's Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee by tweeting that Banerjee is an “unleashed monster” and urged the PM to “tame her” using violence.

https://x.com/KanojiaPJ/status/1798720585721401577

https://x.com/befittingfacts/status/1798702769198842054?s=46&t=raeISQ_GJHRQslUoibooOw

Originally posted by: Grumpydwarf24

I just want to know say something to all the people condemning violence here. I hope your principles were consistent when Kangana called for genocide both against Muslims and farmers (who were not just Sikhs). Instigation of violence is also not protected by freedom of speech under most constitutions. I know for a fact that the US Constitution would not protect it. Especially if the figure in question influences society to a point her followers on social media would listen to her or do what she was told. She got away with the law in those instances. Thus, the principles should be consistent here. A slap to one person is far less dangerous than calling for a genocide or the process of eradication (I think was the exact wording she used) against the many.

She also had zero empathy for the Palestinians being slaughtered. Yet, a slap to her is criminal.

So the slap to kangna must be condemned while she openly supports genocide. other lives humanity ye sab thodi na kuch hai madam ji ke samne

Kangana deserved this slap, that's on Kangana

Coming to CISF lady, it is a scary precedent, someone shot people in a train due to his political ideology that was a police officer, police officer in Manipur turned over women to protesters. Security people are for protection. Sabke paas apni ideology apne reasons apni hate hai, if you are ok with security people slapping someone due to ideological differences then don't cry fascism because this is basis of it, when people who are supposed to protect you, turn against you