I'm not sure how a marriage so supposed to be punishment? Is not having "haq" of virats wife such a big deal that amruta is supposed to cry that she has been made vanchit of this gift?
Is this the 90s? What kind of dated story line is this
Amruta should not get a divorce... She should have FUN... Spend money... Have her brother come live with her as it is jer house now.... Rub it in babitas face... Completely ignore virat... Let him rant... And threaten to call the police if anytime they mistreat her.... They would be begging her for divorce in a week
Like do something different... At least make it entertaining.... Don't become a mazloom bechaari always proving-myself-right detective
According to Virat, yes it is a precious thing. He is in his own bubble. He doesn't even know that their marriage is not valid. When marriage is not valid, what wife? and what haq?
I want either she and her family run away for their own sanity or like you said she has so many options in her hand. If he thinks their marriage is valid then she has every right to have a right on his property. Even though I don't want her to take any of his money but she at least can show him that she can spend his money and he can not stop her.
And in ITV all the morals, ethics and values are for FL. ML can cross so many lines because he is hurt but FL even though reasonable can't do anything because she is supposed to have values.
Amruta, is actually written differently but don't know what her character will be like after this marriage track. Mostly, FLs after marriage have two jobs be a good wife and daughter-in-law.
330