I was watching a few older episodes today as I was trying to kill some time on the road and I realized Ruhis depiction was not at all bad. Her dialogue delivery was the main problem specially in scenes where she was agitated but rest he pain etc came off nicely. Garvita on the other hand is behaving as a desperate lover trying to fasao a man by hook or crook. And yes the transition of jokes scene was not at all convincing. Both acting wise and story wise.Originally posted by: Pinecone
i actually prefer Prats potrayal of Ruhi compared to Garvita. Ruhi is an unlikeable character- period. but when I rewatch old episodes and now I am realizing that I didnt get AS angry to see Ruhi on screen and hate every scene of hers as much as I do with current Ruhi. She is really coming across as being EVIL AND MANIPULATIVE AF in her potrayal. I dont think thats the intention. Garvita herself said she was told she is a +ve character. I think Prats managed to show some softness to Abhira in her potrayal of Ruhi. She genuinely did some scenes well where she looks concerned for Abhira or is touched by Abhiras gestures or even amused by Abhira.She failed miserably in showing love, tadap, angst or tears but I think her amateur acting skills made Ruhi more "innocent". Garvita makes Ruhi a full vamp.
130