Deal or No Deal Season 2 (Sign Up Open)
Free Palestine - Priyanka Chopra Expressions
MATCH MAKING 16.3
Where is Abhir sharma/goenka??
Sarke Chunar Teri - Nora Fatehi New Song Controversy
SUHAAGAN KI NISHAAN 16.3
Battle Of Galwan Changed To Maatrubhumi
Honestly Sahiba should chose herself and free from this trash relationship where it is always Angads way or abuse plus violence. But since she will never chose herself, better use her believing Garry's sudhar jaana as the reason. If Angad saw nothing worth saving in relationship just because she called Garry innocent, it better be that way 🤷
haan yaar roz bhokna rehta h but kaatna nahi matlab sirf dhamki hi deta rahega ya puri bhi karegaOriginally posted by: hellodona
Bhai jo bhi karein jaldi karein. Roj update padhne aati hoon roj kahani udhar hi padi rehti, abuser bhonk raha hai.
I don't know Garry sudhra h ya nahi ya seerat koi devi ya daayan h all I want is sahan ka divorce
Please jaldi todo ye rishta
For me, Angad's flaws were most revealed during Simran track. When he found out about his mother being behind Simran's kidnapping (after yet again distrusting Sahiba for thinking his mom was behind the fiasco, and telling her to get out), he confronted his mom. But within a min, he was successfully wrapped by his mother in her twisted logic of holding Inder and Sahiba for her actions - if they had not insisted upon Simran staying in BM, she would not have had Simran kidnapped at night by two unknown men and sent off to some far away orphanage.
And Angad's dialogs were "Mein phir dorahe per aa khada hun, pata nahin konsa rasta sahi and konsa rasta galat". 
This SHOCKED ME. What Manveer did was PURE EVIL. Manveer, a worldly 60+ yr old woman, sold an 8 year old girl to two men in the dead of night, knowing what happens to young girls under such situations, AND knowing Simran had barely survived the trauma of being sold off earlier.
And Angad in his "dilemma" could not distinguish between what is evil (Selling/kidnapping a young girl) and what are emotional wounds (Manveer's hurt from her husband seeking love elsewhere and a divorce). He put both issues at par.
This showed some wires are seriously wired wrong in his psyche.
Since TMD is not an adult show, makers could not show Simran being raped etc. They instead chose a PG13 route of Simran being poisoned. But reality is that most likely it is fate of girls in Simran's situation. 
How could he put simran and Manveer at par? Manveer is a grown a*sed woman, old enough to maturely deal with wounds from a marriage that was a failure from get go.
Ironically, this was the only time post marriage when Sahiba spoke up about injustices to her and how she feels when all sorts of false charges are always leveled against her. But Angad was lost in his "dilemma" and paid her no heed. He did not even pick up the phone when Sahiba tried to call him when Simran woke up and asked for him. It is only when the transplant crisis arose, he started talking with Sahiba properly.
Heightened level of toxicity is the USP of this show. Coz of my super long break from shows, I had no clue that today’s shows had so much negativity.
Mujhe laga tha Komolika and Ramola Sikand were evil but yeh show toh kuch alag hi level par hai
Komolika and Ramona sikand were evil and the best part was no body justified them bein Dil ke acche.
There was no sympathy for them even in the characters once they get to know their true colors.
But when ur ML is their to abuse your FL so convincingly then what's the need for an out an out villain
Love you for this. The fact that everyone here tried to tell me Sahiba doesn't understand that abusers pain
, can someone think for this grown man's feelings.
Forgive me he calls an innocent kid he bonded with najayaz blood and aww what pain.
That character truly has 0 moral standing, he even defended Seerat throwing the kids things as saaf niyat. Just trash all around.
Originally posted by: Ashviniv
Komolika and Ramona sikand were evil and the best part was no body justified them bein Dil ke acche.
There was no sympathy for them even in the characters once they get to know their true colors.
But when ur ML is their to abuse your FL so convincingly then what's the need for an out an out villain
Totally agree. 
They were hardcore villains and TRP audiences enjoyed them but yeh kya hai, roz roz abuse by Sher Da Puttar
Even a charitable reading of Angad's behavior shows he is an unsteady partner. He does not know how to quantify things and calibrate his angst/anger/hurt accordingly.
He is hurt by Sahiba's faith in Garry and her not taking him into confidence about Garry and Megha etc.
But he makes himself a JOKER when he thinks Sahiba intentionally does things to put him down. Anger, disappointment at Sahiba is one thing. Even lashing out when he voices his feeling of inadequacy is to be expected. But this non stop abuse is truly repugnant
Sahiba's whole freaking life is about selflessness. If she had not taken Garry's help, the diamond would have been been gracing some Russian oligarch the very next day, and Angad would have been langushing in jail. Same goes for house. If Garry had not sent the Judge's coordinates, the house would have been demolished.
He lacks judgment and perspective. And with is non-stop anger and abuse, he is showing himself to be an unsteady & untrustworthy partner
Sahiba has her flaws, biggest being not knowing when to speak and when to stay quiet. She can easily say Garry needs to prove himself and merit trust, rather than staking everything on a belief he has changed. When she can speak up to defend likes of Garry, she should speak up for herself and ram some cold hard facts into the heads of these Brars
Personal Finance
