I mentioned this some time back that people would blame Abhimanyu for Abhir's death. Just as I predicted wahi hua. I just don't know how people find logic in this.

Ooooookayyy If go by the chain of event starting from Ar's accident, AK magnified Ar's death situation by failing to say what needed to be said to the family in order to protect Ruhi who did not even know nor witnessed Ar's death btw. As a result of which Goenka's relationship with Ak fell and so was Ruhi's relationship with Ak. Thereafter, she left the family along with Abhir and Abhimanyu came with her. It was Ak's decision to go far away from UP so they lived in a remote area. In order to fulfil Abhir's wish they agreed to marry and death took place due to A LANDSLIDE - a freaking natural disaster. If we go by looking at it from the chain of event, it was AK's poor decision made around in post Ar's death that brought to this situation. 🙃🙃🙃🙃🙃🙃
My POV regarding Abhi and Abhir's death is different which is that it was caused by a natural disaster lmao. It is very clear neither Ak or Ab is at fault.
If someone really wants to find the chain of events, lets go to back to the root, this whole fiasco then started with Abhi meeting Ak. We can go wayyyyy back to that point as well to talk about cause and effect chain/chain of events. Yet, it is not rational or practical to talk in that sense.
Yes Abhir stayed with Navra for 6 years. He also stayed happily with Abhimanyu too. Abhi also protected him and took care of him. He saved his life, for god sake, from his heart condition. Just because A LANDSLIDE took place, can we blame the person for that? If really want to blame someone, then blame it on universe and nature lol. 
Edited by Manny_123 - 2 years ago
1.3k