Originally posted by: Athz
I thought what they meant to say is she is beautiful but nowhere close to Seerat when it comes to beauty. Probably it's the way she dresses or carries herself in the most basic way. But they say now and then in the show that Sahiba is beautiful.
In the OG this made sense. Because Dyuti was someone who matches the conventional beauty standards and Khori was the one who has a different charm and beauty to her...
But in TMD this comparison doesn't make sense now. Because Sahiba ans Seerats dressing std tho similar hein. I m just sad that they didn't give enough importance to Sahibas art... As in they show her painting now and then... But she doesn't seem attached to her work.... On paper she does... But there aren't enough scenes that convey what value art holds in her life or how art is blended into her character... She comes off as a professional artist not a passionate artist... And they don't connect Angad and Sahiba through kala ... Though initially this was what they conveyed.. Of course the Lord and art brought them together... But except for a scene in the beginning where Sahiba spills paint on Angads sherwani, we don't get many scenes where art connects Sahan. Whereas in the OG , they show Khori as a passionate artist, they blend it well into her character.. everything about her exudes thr beauty of art... As in Dyuti was beautiful but Khori was a muse... And even in riddhi Khori scenes they bring it... And it looked sublime. If the PH succeeds in bringing that into Sahans love story... It would be a different thing altogether... Would elevate the whole experience of watching them... But again that is if they get proper scenes again 🥲🥲🥲 ... Jab Rumi jayega tho humein back to back Seergad cringe milne wala hein.