**Dhruv Tara - Samay Sadi Se Pare Episode Discussion Thread #10 ** - Page 68

Originally posted by: Minhasmansi92

Tune Shayara vali post read ki? Agar ki toh tune comment nhi kiya 😭

Maine Shayra wali story read ki thi but comment karna sach me bhul gayi thi sorry 🙏

Muze Shayra aur Tara ki bhagam bhag funny lagi par Tara apni nanad ke kapde kyu chura rahi thi uske pas apne kapde nahi hai kya chorni kahi ki🤣🤣

Originally posted by: BUSH146

Hawwwww!!😔 aesa kese kr skti chinnu😆

Pr Bzy hogi examzz jo aa rhe hai iske aur may be
Gusse me hai bechari , royal fam k kaand dekho na banda shaant kese ho

Royal Family is injurious for my mental health now

DT telecast se pehle ye log warnings kyu nahi dete 17th century walo ki harkate dekhkar agar aapka dimag kharab ho gaya to hum responsible nahi hai kripaya apni jokhim kar dekhe

Originally posted by: Chinmayi18

It is always good to read interesting articles but it doesn’t make sense from somewhat logical point. It’s ITV so anything is possible but still.

Most hallucinogenic drugs were around for years and years. Modern science has made them identifiable that’s it. They even found a version of anaesthesia similar to fentanyl during mahavirs surgery.

It isn’t about knowing dad or uncle - his own family have lied to him since he could remember and it was an active lie. Tara and her family are wrong but they haven’t actively lied to him. They changed the subject and Tara even said I can’t tell you during that hug sequence so to me depriving a young kid of dad when he was right there is worst than not telling a grown man that his dad was Ravi.

Dhruv since the beginning has never been revenge type guy. For tara her dad has testified that Dhruv harmed him she would be totally heartbroken just like Dhruv is right now over his dad. One is that Ravi isn’t dead whereas king is, and two king apologised. She goes to meet him and I hope she thinks but if she doesn’t I wouldn’t find fault in her. However I would like that she thinks or maybe kanaji can help her like he did today with gifts.

Samrat kidnapped Ravi, why? If as per him the intention was never to reveal Ravi is the dad then why bother kidnapping him? In fact why bother bringing Ravi in the picture? Dhruv himself wouldn’t go to meet him but queen took him. It would have been more believable had Ravi and Dhruv met in prison and Dhruv would have figured out that way.

I have always seen DT together and I hope whatever it is they will handle it together as their love is blessed by god himself. Since confessing- the main issue was stopping the wedding but this is the first time their love is being tested and I hope they both pass with flying colours.

In IPKKND I wanted khushi to leave Arnav because he used to manhandle her all the time and say terrible things to her on a daily basis. Here Tara hasn’t gone out of her way to belittle Dhruv or without rhyme or reason punish him. She is only requesting him to listen and then said don’t talk like that - but who wouldn’t? When they tried to explain about Ravi Dhruv didn’t want to, and queen tara and Mahavir have always supported Dhruv. King once he got to know the truth has supported him too. If we can’t see that then sushila was terrible too and she made Tara’s life miserable in 21st century.

I also think hitting when one has no weapon is very low class and Dhruv wouldn’t do that if it is definitely him and therefore he has to be under influence. It’s not a sign of a good man who attacks when other is sleeping - have a proper fight and that would be believable so I have hope that there is a proper explanation there.

Samrat knew which button to push he is brilliant that way. If king is indeed dead and Dhruv killed him then death sentence is justified. If Dhruv was under the influence or something else then I want DT to work together to find out. Mahavir has his own issues - an unwanted wife, a suicidal ex fiancée, and a dead dad. If Dhruv was stressed because of all the things around him then I bet Mahavir is super stressed. He got married to someone he doesn’t even know.

What is weird is attacking a king when he was vulnerable and in his room relaxing. If there is a lookalike he must be a very very smart one - smarter than DT put together as he not only managed to get the mannerisms and clothes right but even knew the precise time and place to do his cowardly attack.

Okay, I understand your point. Tara being of 17th centuring has way more far mindset as com pared to any 21st century Person 😲

For Tara, she has, never though of falling in love with someone, as in there century love after marriage and or whatever.. was believed. And She may had not ever spoke against her father . This justifies her unable less to take a stand for her love👍🏼

But I wished, she had been more bold in front of Samrat, ke" Agar ham aapke tan per Adhikar karna chahe" . Instead of being scared she should had gave him a befitting reply🤔

I also agree on the point that she hid the truth when Ravi was kidnap for his safety, and it was okay. But after Samrat being caught. She must have told Dhruv about it , a small lie can create a big MU which has now happened . Apne jr. dumbraj bhai ki itni bhi nahi Sunni hoti

And BTW, mujhe ek boot sumajh nahi first of all she was marrying Samrat for Ravi baba but when her marriage is fixed with Dhruv, tab bhi to Ravi baba khatre mein thr ,Ravi Baba ke liye Dhruv to sacrifice kar sakti par Shaad postpone nahi kar sakti🤪

Tara in 21st century was a commoner ,if someone had not listen to her it did not affected her much but in 17 century where she is a princess and she and her family is regarded very respectfully and no one even had tried to raise a finger on her father , Dhruv constant accusations , made her feel disrespectful.😭

Aur Dhruv ke character, to writers overboard lekar Jaa rahe h . But IMO for this instance it is genuine. The truth was a drastic one, 25 years of pain can't be handle patiently. I feel Dhruv is not angry that on Tara because of Ravi, but because she had hid the truth. After that Shaadi wali MU ne aur problem badha di ,use sach jaane 24 ghante bhi nahi hue , ye shaadi ki rat Sunega to gussa to aaega hi, But I believe ek aadh din mein thik ho jayega.👍🏼

Aur Ravi baba shayad ye soch kar ki kuchh ghate ki baat hai soch kar nikal gaye honge Bina bataye, par kuchh ghante 25 saal ban jayenge unhe sapna thodi na aaya hoga , bus makers unhe bolne de fir decide karenge ki taarif karni h ya roast krna h🤣

Haa ,DT ki lovestory kanha ji ne banayi h fullfill to hogi h , par main 17th century se bore ho gayi hu , iss rajya mein Raj pariwar ke alawa kisi ko koi samasya nahi h , aisa bhi hota h kya🤪 🤣

Sorry ,for the Tag

Originally posted by: aekiel

I thought Dhruv (while his anger is justified) probably went overboard in one or two sentences, but the episode pretty accurately describes what happens when anger takes over you. You lose your sense of reasoning, and might end up saying a couple of things to hurt the other person that you'd usually not say.

Again, this is a classic 21st/17th century difference- Dhruv's method of expressing his anger is very 21st century-ish. Everyone is equal. and the lowest guy has all the rights to shout at the biggest person.

The Rajparivaar, in the 17th, have probably never had any one shout at them the way Dhruv did today, so the "bar" for perceived insult in their minds is pretty low. Not Tara's fault exactly, but that's the implicit class difference for you (it comes out subconsciously), and Dhruv, who'd probably shout the same way if the guilty party were Tillu's parents instead of Tara's, feels it.

Absolutely correct- I said the same thing in my post too. I think we need to look at it from a different perspective lenses. Let’s say even in 21st century no one would dare yell or shout at King Charles. That’s just not done. Megan tried and they never reacted or responded and she is his daughter in law. Why then in 17th century we expect they would be any different?

Another thing is apart from not saying Ravi is the dad they haven’t done anything else. Yes the king punished him but he also admitted that had he known he wouldn’t have.

Anger indeed is terrible and whilst justified it never lets you see reason. That’s why I was happy that he was left alone to ponder. I wonder would he be this angry when reality of his real dad is out? A young kid who needs and should have his dad around was made to believe his dad ran away. That was a lie- a lie that is still ongoing. I know in india cultural adoption is norm but having a dad and to think he had no dad is brutal to a little kid in my opinion than a grown man who thinks his fiancée’s family are lying.

Originally posted by: Tia-life

Okay, I understand your point. Tara being of 17th centuring has way more far mindset as com pared to any 21st century Person 😲

For Tara, she has, never though of falling in love with someone, as in there century love after marriage and or whatever.. was believed. And She may had not ever spoke against her father . This justifies her unable less to take a stand for her love👍🏼

But I wished, she had been more bold in front of Samrat, ke" Agar ham aapke tan per Adhikar karna chahe" . Instead of being scared she should had gave him a befitting reply🤔

I also agree on the point that she hid the truth when Ravi was kidnap for his safety, and it was okay. But after Samrat being caught. She must have told Dhruv about it , a small lie can create a big MU which has now happened . Apne jr. dumbraj bhai ki itni bhi nahi Sunni hoti

And BTW, mujhe ek boot sumajh nahi first of all she was marrying Samrat for Ravi baba but when her marriage is fixed with Dhruv, tab bhi to Ravi baba khatre mein thr ,Ravi Baba ke liye Dhruv to sacrifice kar sakti par Shaad postpone nahi kar sakti🤪

Tara in 21st century was a commoner ,if someone had not listen to her it did not affected her much but in 17 century where she is a princess and she and her family is regarded very respectfully and no one even had tried to raise a finger on her father , Dhruv constant accusations , made her feel disrespectful.😭

Aur Dhruv ke character, to writers overboard lekar Jaa rahe h . But IMO for this instance it is genuine. The truth was a drastic one, 25 years of pain can't be handle patiently. I feel Dhruv is not angry that on Tara because of Ravi, but because she had hid the truth. After that Shaadi wali MU ne aur problem badha di ,use sach jaane 24 ghante bhi nahi hue , ye shaadi ki rat Sunega to gussa to aaega hi, But I believe ek aadh din mein thik ho jayega.👍🏼

Aur Ravi baba shayad ye soch kar ki kuchh ghate ki baat hai soch kar nikal gaye honge Bina bataye, par kuchh ghante 25 saal ban jayenge unhe sapna thodi na aaya hoga , bus makers unhe bolne de fir decide karenge ki taarif karni h ya roast krna h🤣

Haa ,DT ki lovestory kanha ji ne banayi h fullfill to hogi h , par main 17th century se bore ho gayi hu , iss rajya mein Raj pariwar ke alawa kisi ko koi samasya nahi h , aisa bhi hota h kya🤪 🤣

Galti se Galat vibha ko quote ho gaya tha, 😕

Originally posted by: aekiel

A bit yes, but she comes from an era where people actually followed up on their threats, and pita ke badle pita was probably a norm for punishments.

Dhruv comes from the 21st, where normal folks don't try to take justice into their hands, but Tara's mind is not that of a 21st century person, not yet at least.

So when Dhruv mentions it, the primal fear takes over in her mind (that the person threatening MEANS what he is saying, and her father's life is in actual danger), and the protective reaction automatically follows.

Not justifying what she's saying- just an insight into her thought process from a 17th century lens.

We do think alike, I said almost similar thing in my post too. Tara is not of 21st century and back in 17th punishments were eye for an eye. Let’s not even go that far - anyone who has read on Henry VIII knows what he did and how he meted out justice.

In navajo Indian culture eye for an eye was norm until recently. Tara also is a princess whereas Dhruv is a common man and his viewpoint is very much modern. We all are modern so it’s easy to relate to Dhruv and not understand Tara. I recall I went to a friends place and her grandparents had come from india and they asked me my caste. No one ever had until then and I was upset and she told me that they are from a small village in india and it’s normal there. Never knew but thought was super hypocritical that they came overseas and sat next to people on a plane and I bet they didn’t ask their caste but had to ask mine. Anyway, made me understand that just because I am liberal and modern doesn’t mean everyone else will be too.

Originally posted by: Chinmayi18

17th century me aise medicines milte honge I remember samrat ne bola tha prem medicines hote hai jise dekar D ne T ko fasaya hai premjal me 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Bhul gaye vahi Jadi buti se to, chirkut ne fasaya tha Dumbraj Ko Apne Prem Jaal Mein🤣

Inke sare angles audience ke liye mad angles bante ja rahe hain ab 😝😝

Sahi hai Itni theories ka angle hai ki ,mera brain kam karna band kar raha hai , Main To yahan per baate karne aati hu , theories ko deeply sochne ke liye we have other folks ,who are really smart 👍🏼

Agar Dhruv ko pata hota Ravi uska papa nahi hai to woh apne chacha ke liye dangle karta simple 😆

Yah to Papa aur chacha se bhi jyada gehra rishta hai chapa ka rishta , two in one 😛

Originally posted by: Chinmayi18

Royal Family is injurious for my mental health now

DT telecast se pehle ye log warnings kyu nahi dete 17th century walo ki harkate dekhkar agar aapka dimag kharab ho gaya to hum responsible nahi hai kripaya apni jokhim kar dekhe

Exactly, inhe pehle hi disclaimer dena chahiye tha , mere brain cells ko jo iss royal family ne torture diya hai , pucho mat .Ab to roast krne jao to bhi lagta h ki inke baare mein sochna padega , Chhodo 😆😆.