I wrote this post in another thread, but this thread seems more appropriate for the content of my post..... so copy and pasting again.
It was hard seeing Ak in that state. But it was critical to bring her down a notch. She had arrogantly placed herself on a pedestal of self-righteousness and was passing judgment every day on Ab. I want to see if she does some real thinking now. I agree the divorce was bad, but contrary to what all say, it was an equally hard time for both. No one was enjoying it, both were unable to control their emotions and lashed out in anger and grief in their own ways..... Ab by asking for divorce which was inhumane, and Ak by hiding the baby using him as a revenge tool since Ab refused to listen in his distraught state. The difference is Ab made an impulsive decision 6 years back, it was not preplanned, but what Ak did for the last 6 years was well thought out. Every step was intentional with the aim to hurt Ab. Therein lies the main difference between their actions.
For once Mj was right. I Wish Ak had understood this 6 years back and given them all space to stabilize themselves. Then none of this would've even happened.... but Ak has never been sensitive about others' emotions. She was an empath, so she always thought she had to go impose herself even where she was not needed. Her POV was sharing grief, but she never understood what Mj said today, the person who is the cause of grief can never give comfort at that point. best would be to leave and let others help. Glad Ab listened, and was sensitive enough to give them all space. and left, otherwise there would've been some ugly words exchanged today, and more MUs may have been created.
But, I'm most happy that the BC fraud was called out. Just because Ak gave birth, it did not make her God. She desired to change nature by falsifying a document as sacred as the BC. Being divorced does not give a woman the right to change her child's identity. That child will always be the son of the birth father. I've written this before, but again, if she wanted Nav to be her child's father, she should've disclosed the truth to Ab and got legal consent from Ab for Nav to adopt. Only a legal adoption can allow a change in the BC, but that decision was Ab's, not Ak's. So, even if AB gives Abhir to Ak, saying he will visit on the weekends, and pays child alimony (to which she cannot object anymore), that child will be Abhir Birla from now onwards. It was always jarring to hear Nav shamelessly claim him as his son, especially in front of Ab, and he tried his best to keep it that way by acting nice to Ab, so he does not raise this BC issue. Yes, as Ak's husband, he was Abhir's caretaker and helped Ak raise him, but the claim of any legal rights without a proper adoption procedure was wrong.
Let's see where this goes now.... it's hard to predict. But they have to disclose the truth.... Navra's main judgment is in front of Abhir. How are they going to justify all the falsehood they have been feeding him? And answer his question as to why they did not reveal the truth even after he knew that Nav was not the real father. If Nav could explain divorce as katti between adults, they could have revealed Ab's identity easily and shared some co-parenting arrangements among themselves. Rather in their selfishness they procrastinated and kept Ab and ABhir waiting. I feel Ak's premonition will also come true, she will stand guilty in Abhir's eyes and he will call Navra out for that.
End of copy-paste
Also, given Ab's sensitive nature, I think he will come up with some solution. Now that he has custody h has full rights to decide for Abhir. And honestly, he has always been an honest and fair-minded person, so I'm waiting for the next steps from him. The only thing I don't want him to change is the BC thing.... that child needs to be given his real identity and that is Abhir Birla, so let's see..... hoping the story will finally move forward.
Edited by aardhan - 2 years ago
Arjun
Cricket
Indian Mythology
28