What does that flower scene emphasize - Page 2

Pglu Cvs hai they don't think at all aise blooper nikalenge toh har dialogue mein blooper niklega

May be abhinav did not kept his flowers properly 😆 kuch aur bolne ka risk nahi le sakthi main 🤣

Originally posted by: janecastle

Ok I am getting confused here.. Muskaan is adopted?? Did they say this in epi?

I think Abhinav knew Neelama and Muskaan before he met Akshara. He said that Akshara made his house a home. So he did live in that house before Akshara came. That means he knew them from earlier.

Makers had that dialogue written where US chachi said that there is no atta pata of Muskaan's family... And khoon khandaan na..

These scenes are just there to give hopes to their audience that their OG ship will be back till then they have to hang in there

Originally posted by: firewings_diya

May be abhinav did not kept his flowers properly 😆 kuch aur bolne ka risk nahi le sakthi main 🤣

🤣 Aur bohot kuch bol sakte hai... Mein start karne mein help kar sakti hoon.. 🤪matlab overanalyze karne mein kya hi jaata hai...

I saw that last part ka clip and it was funny rather than any symbolic connotation that makers wanted to give. But let's see -

Abhira reached Tulsi first, Abhinav appeared in-between them. He gave phool to Akshu and prayed for MuKa ki happy beginningnot important ... Abhinav ka phool fell toh shayad woh ab AbhiRa ke beech se hatne wala hai....

Originally posted by: shahsb_26

Makers had that dialogue written where US chachi said that there is no atta pata of Muskaan's family... And khoon khandaan na..

Oh I thought she was just being her nasty self and mocking Muskaan for being from a poor family with no parents. If Muskaan is an orphan, then it is possible that Nav knew her from a long time. And Neelama adopted her and Nav also stayed close to them.

Originally posted by: DevilHere

Pglu Cvs hai they don't think at all aise blooper nikalenge toh har dialogue mein blooper niklega

😆 toh let's remind writers.. I have asked someone to upload that clip. Once she does that... Will post it here because I don't think there is any inconsistency as such...

Originally posted by: firewings_diya

May be abhinav did not kept his flowers properly 😆 kuch aur bolne ka risk nahi le sakthi main 🤣

Very good 🤣

Originally posted by: janecastle

Oh I thought she was just being her nasty self and mocking Muskaan for being from a poor family with no parents. If Muskaan is an orphan, then it is possible that Nav knew her from a long time. And Neelama adopted her and Nav also stayed close to them.

Surekha wants this alliance to break so she will spew venom everywhere.. For her someone must break either abhinav akshu Or muskaan kairav Or abhimanyu arohi.. She tries at all ends..

She is a match breaker.. If im not wrong naira sent her kids to jail in season 2 so she is taking badla from naira kids akshu and kairav.. Unnecessary spewing venom all the time about themthem Or their partners

Originally posted by: shahsb_26

🤣

Arrey, I do get confused with makers but I read somewhere that Muskaan ka character was always written - post-leap to be opposite Bhaiyya... But then, why did those pre-leap writers not know what was planned post-leap, had writers changed?

Only mismatch there is Sharma surname - Woh kahan se aaya? Bass yeh curiosity nth level ki hai... But he maintained that he was from Kasauli, Himachal Pradesh, just clip dekhi maine - I clipped it too. Let's see.

Actually it is job of makers to show the story clearly not for us to confuse like all this.. But this makers na like they took the story from dustbin they are showing it in bits and pieces.. So it's confusing us all..