Originally posted by: Navyya
. Yes , that’s what I have been saying …. I , for one , don’t want to live in delusion and accept something that’s ridiculously absurd and a joke …. On top of it humongous insult to the institution of marriage . Two grown up married partners indulging in sex and later feeling as if they have committed a crime due to some stupid contract is as big a NO for me as a MR .
See we are thinking if there is no MR then why and what happened. So everyone is trying to make sense somehow with different theories.
But if you go by MR then there is no trial or error only punishment. Bcoz no one in their sane minds would love a happy ending in this scenario. So you have to agree that you never knew murtasim and Meerab. Bcoz if MR happened then it is too much contrast to their personas. So how did MR happen.
Everyone telling murtasim is a feudal lord firstly they forget something's about him. He may be feudal lord but he was educated, he had dreams which he sacrificed. He never believed in this system and wanted to be a part of it. If we go by the scene where he explains Meerab. So how could someone like him change so much in mostly 4-5 years that he will thing MR is ok.
When he was all about winning his wife not just for sex but for companionship and trust too. He wanted Meerab to trust him then in a spilt second he has broken that trust and in no way Meerab would ever trust him again. So if there was MR and he felt guilty afterwards then murtasim would be afraid Meerab will leave him and wouldn't go strolling leaving her alone. So that's a big NO.
If we remember village episode, about naila thing, he wanted to assert his dominance but still thought 10 steps forward. So how does such man just forget and do this thing. I have no idea.
So all this dilemma. Trying to make sense of this blunder which was MR plot.
We can only wait for further episodes to get clarity bcoz for now it is a mess which has no exit.
742