Originally posted by: mango.falooda
also didn't like when the committee rolled their eyes at "innocent till proven guilty" that viaan said -- that is exactly what this committee is supposed to do. why are they calling it philosophy in sarcasm? oye board lady, you are supposed to also consider whether shamita might be a liar. 🤦
instead, everyone -- including katha -- has decided that viaan is already guilty. 🙄 that is why no one is asking logical questions that prove otherwise.
I am sure this happens in real life too, unfortunately a woman's tears are sometimes seen as 'proof' of her being the victim and a stoic man who speaks facts is seen to be cold-hearted/guilty. There already seems to be a bias against him in the panel and they may let this affect their final verdict.