Originally posted by: SoulSpiller
Objection your honour! Strong objection! The defendent here is calling Anupamaa the problem when she was caught in the barrage of Anuj's unreasonable anger and tantrums. All she was trying to do was remain calm for him and that further aggravated the mania in him - if after all this, Anupama takes him back with zero consequences for his actions, then it will be completely her own fault!....wait this is exactly what the defendent has argued...oh....ah...actually I have no objections, your honour. I'll just be...I'll just be sitting down now.
Objection to both of your arguments. That lowly punk dared to question Maaās Mamta. To bring her daughter back, the great Maa is even ready to sacrifice her holy place of being the ATMās cashier. That shows the depth of her love. And after this if that lowly punk tries to put any blame on her then it will be entirely that punkās fault. If Maa takes him back it will be because she knows that lowly punk canāt survive without her. She will just be saving him from a future casualty