Originally posted by: Kumuda-123
@bold it will be seen as creative liberty. Because they didn't show any process, didn't show candidates applying job & sai getting it out of recommendation.
I don't know how it is favour of sai when virat is shown approving her job, she is in a position of working under him. It's favour of sairat and Virat.
They want to show a plot where sai works under virat. So showed it.
Where as virat crimes are not like this. They clearly showed him allowing illegal surrogacy despite him knowing it is wrong, they showed him ousting two woman despite knowing it is not safety for them, they showed him abusing his power despite him knowing it is not legal. In all virat crimes, someone SUFFERED that's why the outrage.
If they showed some candidates suffering because of sai, sai doing it not caring about their sufferings, she will also definitely face outrage.
As far as I remember she got called for forging divorce documents as it should. In both show and outside of the show she got called out for it.
U think people don't file IBF complaint just because it favours sai fl. No.
It's because that said action didn't cause any harm to anyone in the show.
Unlike Virat and pakhi crimes where they clearly showed someone suffering because of it.
When they see a character suffering because of certain crimes. Then those crimes will definitely get called out.
If sai abuses her doctor power and makes virat or pakhi character suffer then she too will definitely called out.
For eg: No one felt outrage when virat misused his power and warned aniket indirectly. Because that action of him caused no harm to anyone. That's why people didn't find it wrong. They took it as creative liberty to show ml jealousy and people also enjoyed it.
Are Baba.... My point was not V.... please read the original comment.
It is DIG offering the job to Sai in the first place is what is corruption in real world.
DIG is asking V because she is his ex wife.... for his peace of mind. Even if V says no and Sai says yes... it would be corruption.
My point was on the selection process which should have been followed.
And its not physical harm only... if it was there wouldn't be court cases pending in India on recruitment scams.
Its the idea of surreptitious dealing, denying the rights to every candidate.
Can we just end it here, please?
3