Originally posted by: SteFanSalvaTor
I didn’t say that he has no contribution in his sons success, all his m saying is the fact that he’s contributed to his son’s career itself isn’t a reason for Allu Arjun’s career, the way people are saying he’s an Alia or Ranbir, it’s definitely not what I’ll ever agree with. Similarly if he can curate full family’s career then he definitely contributed in Charan’s career too, it can’t be like he’s favoring only selective families, his father is the reason for the legacy of this family so they all have inherited it from Allu Ramlingam, but that itself isn’t the reason why don’t of their kids are pan India stars and some didn’t clock, it takes both talent and opportunities, Arvind definitely made opportunities for the mega kids but if the kids are as successful as bunny today then it’s a two way boat, just how having 17 flops in a row still didn’t vanish off Abhishekh, Bunny or Charan didn’t let it go till 17 flops right? From Arya itself he has worked on every character the way it was needed, neither he looks lazy onscreen or talks stupid stuff offscreen, RO getting dharma films like Brahmarastra even post massive flops like Bombay velvet and still consisted to be sth big is compared with Allu Arjun and Charan who never saw such massive disasters nor did they were miscast in their hit. And Charan had biggest movies like the ones with Rajamouli, it’s not Arvind or anyone else’s fault that he struggled a bit, they can’t spoon feed their kids and they don’t.
it’s like saying Rakesh Roshan saved Hrithik by making koi milgaya, whereas I will say koi mil Gaya worked only because it was the combination of Rakesh and Hrithik.
CID
Tum Se Tum Tak
Cricket
Anupamaa
Hollywood
Sports
26