Originally posted by: blue-ice.1
Why the discrimination.....You said Deepu has a long list of BFs(which is absolutely OK) but in the same note you are calling RK a PLAYER for having a long list of GFs....why is Deepu not being called a PLAYER......why is it OK to sl ut shame a man but all hell will break loose if someone does the same to a woman....in my opinion neither is right....
I haven't read the whole thread so I don't know the context for what you said...but my question is a generic one and doesn't need a context....
If you are going to shame a man for having GFs ...do not defend a woman for doing the same.....those girls willingly became RK's GFs for whatever reason....but it was mutual....none of these women are angels....they have their own agenda ....like someone said that Deepika used the relationship to further her career....
And I never said Deepika was not a player either. My point was what aboutism will never be a valid argument. It will always be a logical fallacy. People only resort to it when they have been cornered into accepting a reality they do not like? Did I object to anyone calling out Deepika for XYZ? But there is no point in brining it up on this thread? It will not take away anything from what the thread was originally supposed to be about. That is what aboutism it does not prove a thing! If you want to make a separate thread go ahead. But it still does not undo the reality of RK. It clearly looks like someone had an issue with here and resorted to what aboutism.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/whataboutism-origin-meaning
6