Ok why is Raavan dressed up like a Cental Asian Islamic invader of the 14th century ???
🏏IPL 2026: CSK vs LSG, 59th Match, Lucknow on 15/05/2026🏏
🏏IPL 2026: GT vs KKR, 60th Match, Kolkata on 16/05/2026🏏
Episode dtd 15.5
Anupamaa 16 May 2026 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
What do you think guys?
Pati Patni Aur Woh Do has dull start
Abhishek Bachchan New Look
Official Teaser - Welcome To The Jungle
Episode dtd 16.5
Ok why is Raavan dressed up like a Cental Asian Islamic invader of the 14th century ???
saif and kriti were always miscast
who on the earth thought saif will look ravan,
bollywood pls stop these atrocities seeing baahubali and rrr
ramayan can be shot beautifully in natural locations and needs cgi only for war scenes
mythology is a different ball game from even historicals, you dont just get up and make them
Yes yes and yes to all this.
Why use unnecessary cgi for normal scenes. They can literally shoot that 1st hill/waterfall scene or Sita on the swing scene in a real location. In india. No need to spend money on foreign location too.
everyone looks so bad in this. It’s like a bad mashup of many movies and series.
Originally posted by: SteFanSalvaTor
Ram Charan should have been Ram and Allu Arjun the Raavan, they would’ve been terrific. Here Saif looking like khilji from padmavat
Kreethy Suresh/Pooja Hegde as Sita 😍
This Sita is looking like a cartoon & can't act too
this was so atrocious, had to cleanse my eyes watching the older ramayana movies in telugu
i thought om raut will be a more rooted given his marathi origin, so disappointing
saif and kriti were always miscast
who on the earth thought saif will look ravan, look at arvind trivedi in the serial and ntr or rakumar in bhookailas and theor get up
prabhas has obviously deteriorated and no excuse whatsoever but with a decent director he was might have done something
no, not ram charan and not even original lord ram could have saved this
it would have been the same disaster any which way
bollywood pls stop these atrocities seeing baahubali and rrr
ps1 worked because mani had it in his mind since ages and an idea on how make it, he kept the cgi minimal and played on his strengths and sensibility, baahubali's 2 part movie gave him the idea of making it in 2 parts too
ramayan can be shot beautifully in natural locations and needs cgi only for war scenes
mythology is a different ball game from even historicals, you dont just get up and make them
You are right. These actors don't look divine at all. All are miscast, especially Sita
Originally posted by: Lostsoul11
You are right. These actors don't look divine at all. All are miscast, especially Sita
Haath dho kar peechhey padna isi ko kehte hain
Every post of yours is about Kriti as Sita 🤣
Ravana was a actually a learned man, he was a great king, very well versed in music and literature, he was alo a great shiva devotee, he committed mistakes which was his karma
saif looks like some pyscho maniac,, even his costume is not proper
why make these movies if you dont understand it
It's been the same in every Ramayana adaptation unless it's from the 60s/70s era (I'm remembering an old telugu movie here). The makers always gloss over Ravana and build an image of psycho to portray his grave mistake of capturing Sita. As it be, Ravana never harmed Sita in his captivity. He took great care of her. He was a great devout of Lord Shiva and even played veena with his intestines and tendons to seek penance from Shiva. Although born as a Rakshasha, he is worshipped as a God in many parts of India and Sri Lanka. His anger and ego got the best of him. He was a flawed man but absolutely not the kind of villain any of these movies portray him as.
Ewwwww 500 cr and they do this🤢
Merko aajkal har jagah GOT ka influence kayku dikh rela? Animation quality bhot low laga... Also, Kriti literally 10 feet lambi dikh reli uske scene mein😆
Originally posted by: AdrakKombucha
Merko aajkal har jagah GOT ka influence kayku dikh rela? Animation quality bhot low laga... Also, Kriti literally 10 feet lambi dikh reli uske scene mein😆
She's a miscast, probably the weakest link of the film but her PR won't acknowledge this truth
I am missing Sagars and Arun Govil, Dipika, Dara Singh ji already.
Their Ramayan was way better despite no special effects.
This is weird and I cannot understand if it is live action ir animated film.
Kriti is miscast. No way looking like Sita.
Prabhas is MISCAST. No way fit to play Lord Rama. I am missing all TV actors like Gurmeet and that Siya Ke Ram lead actor as well now.
Is Prabhas still stuck in Bahubali mode?
Looks like a cartoon.
Not even cartoon. The cartoon Ramayan was also better which was shown on Cartoon Network in 2000s.
Ravan is a joke. I am missing all TV actors also who played Ravan.
Shah Rukh Khan at Rajat Sharma’s daughter’s wedding https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWuFEJJjBzM/ For Salman fans see post below
https://www.instagram.com/p/DPbBT_cjyMq/?igsh=czdibmJuM2ljeGhx
Salman Khan rushes to Lilavati hospital after father Salim Khan admitted for medical care Shortly after the... Read more at:...
Shah Rukh Khan and Salman Khan dancing https://www.instagram.com/reel/DRO4Vo9DcUg/?igsh=ZXExZ2p0aGQzMWxv
https://x.com/imvangasandeep/status/2006432369365102625
5