Originally posted by: simple65
I find it biased when a character's flaws is decided on the basis of actor playing it.
The discussion gets really boring once they start suporting a character on d basis of actor playing it.
It often happens here, cez fans will be supporting Nik and Rajshree fans support pallavi.
I think the discussion needs to be unbiased or else it kills d spirit and interest too.
In NikVi's case both are at equal fault. People accusing Nik for lack of communication, I must mention, firstly he doesn't remember what really happened that night that pallavi is accusing him of spending a night wid sonali. I think pallavi never really told Nik what she saw that night. So i feel, this communication gap is from Pallavi's side.
Nik didn't trust Sonali but yeah he hid facts from Pallavi which was 100% wrong but Pallavi had started believing Sonali.
I wonder, a guy like Nik(Casanova in his bachelor days), married to Pallavi for 7 yrs wid 3 kids, had only got Sonali ,out of all the girls in the world, to cheat wid.
The first tym Sonali manipulated Pallavi was when Pallavi was pregnant wid Barkha and sonali also got married by that tym.
I don't know,from where people's perception of, being Nik developing Communication gap arised.
TBVBH, if would hv been at Nik's place, I too won't have given clarification to my partner.
Nik said to Shanky- " uska iss tarah se questioning smjh aata h but sonali ko le k, uski khud ki behen ko le????"
7 yrs of marriage, a casnova guy changed to one woman man and then u think he cheated u wid ur sister is a serious allegation. And here pallavi didn't even clear ki kis halat me usne dono ko dekha.
like I said Dono ek jaise hai both are at faults and that beauty of show none are perfect or trying to be mahaan .
I agree absolutely with you