Bolly-Mytho-ITV Team Sheep Game #4 : Winners etc. Pg 1 & 116 - Page 24

Team score upload karenge kya ?

Originally posted by: DelusionsOfNeha

in this house we stan women supporting each other

Exactly. Girl power!!! 🥳

Let's not pit them against each other over worthless men

Originally posted by: Dipsdj

The discussion that's going over here is like u guys r discussing class 10th /12th board exams questions

😁😁😁

Guys pls stop this for/against debate all ur points/thoughts r correct but now kya faida when results r out.

Originally posted by: Rani_Sahiba

Congratulations🥳🥳

Thanks😃 how many u got?

Originally posted by: Alaukik

yeah agree

she is better than pandavas

actually they don't deserve her

Deserve toh woh throne bhi nahi karte the par mila na?? Waise birth ko hi basis banaya gaya throne ki liye just because Yudhishthir dharmaraj ka putra tha woh better tha or Duryodhan ko sideline kiya gaya jiska nateeja tha Mahabharat. Waise jo Aadmi gambling kare or apni biwi ko stake kare wo throne kaise deserve karta hai🤷‍♀️

Originally posted by: BrhannadaArmour

Team Duryodhan, please join the new thread!

Our scores so far (Round 1, bonus, Round 2):

BrhannadaArmour : +25, +45, +15 = +85

Rubabbb: +18, +45, +6 = +69

infinity101: +18, +45, -30 (didn't submit, two days after I made safe from swapping) = +33

opsora2090: +46, +45, +6 = +97

Bodhianveshika: +4, +45, +51 = +100

NautankiSaali17: ?, +95, -12

Chiillii: 0, 0, +15 = +15

Namita-M: +4, +95, +24 = +123

Pribz: -3, +95, +15 = +107

Kulasya.: ?, +95, +33

By adding Namita-M, Pribz, and Kulasya. to Team Duryodhan, we lost the scores of these swapped teammates:

Shividhadkndilk: 0, 0, +24

Dipsdj: 0, 0, +42

Rani_Sahiba: 0, 0, +42

Sorry, I was busy earlier, and so I couldn't tag/discuss the Round 2 answers in thread #3.

Kaṃsa was originally not an evil character; he is among the Viśvedevas in heaven alongside Ugrasena and Vasudeva (Mahābhārata: Svargārohaṇaparvan 5.14). When Kṛṣṇa narrates why he killed Kaṃsa (Sabhāparvan 13.29-33), he only says this: Kaṃsa subdued his cousins, married Asti and Prāpti, daughters of Bārhadratha (Jarāsaṃdha) and younger sisters of Sahadeva, and with that power, won presidency over his relatives, which was a really big injustice on his part; so, the elders chose Kṛṣṇa and Saṃkarṣaṇa to kill Kaṃsa and Sunāman, while getting Ugrasena's daughter Sutanu married to Akrūra. If Kaṃsa had ever tried to kill Kṛṣṇa, let alone killed Devakī's babies, wouldn't Kṛṣṇa's narration have included that provocation? The genealogy in Harivaṃśa (critical edition) doesn't mention Devakī bearing more than one child. So, the characterization of Kaṃsa as a serial baby-killer whom Kṛṣṇa killed with his bare hands because he didn't deserve a heroic death seems to be a later development.

Members who reason that Rāvaṇa didn't kill innocent babies might be interested in versions of the story in which Rāvaṇa has to dispose of newborn Sītā because she will cause his ruin. For example, in Vasudevahiṇḍī, written in the Māhārāṣṭrī Prākṛta language and dated as early as the 4th century C.E. (Chapter 14: Mayaṇavegā-lambha):

aṇṇayā kayā'i Ma'o nāma vijjāharo duhiyaṃ ghettūṇa se sevā-puvvam uvatthi'o Mandodarī nāma. Some other time, a wizard named Ma'a approached him with tribute, bringing his daughter named Mandodarī. daṃsiyā lakkhaṇa-vi'usāṇaṃ. She was shown to physiognomists. tehiṃ bhaṇiyaṃ - jo imī'e paḍhama-gabbho bhavissa'i so kula-kkhaya-he'u tti. They said - this one's first baby will be the reason for the family's ruin. sā ya a'īva rūvassiṇi tti na paricattā. Yet she was extremely beautiful, and so she was not rejected. jāyam avaccaṃ paḍhamaṃ ca'issāmo tti vivāhiyā. When the first offspring is born, we'll abandon it - thus, she was married. ... Mandodarī ya Rāmaṇa-gga-mahisī dāriyaṃ pasūyā. And Mandodarī, Rāmaṇa's chief lady, delivered a girl. tato rayaṇa-bhariyāe mañjūsāe pakkhittā. Then she was dropped into a casket filled with jewels. saṃdiṭṭho Mandodarīe amacco - vaccasu, ujjhasu ṇaṃ ti. Mandodarī instructed a commander - go, discard this.

My reason for holding Kaikayī more responsible than Mantharā is one that no one has mentioned so far: Kaikayī had influence and Mantharā was just a servant. If Mantharā had gone directly to Rāma and said, Daśaratha promised his kingdom as the price (rājya-śulka; Ayodhyākāṇḍa 99.3) to marry Kaikayī, so you have to go into forest exile, would Rāma have obeyed Mantharā? No, the question of royal succession would have been resolved without anyone going into exile. True to character, Bharata would have said no ... Kaikayī would have said, Bharata's turn comes after Rāma's centennial ... Daśaratha and Aśvapati would have agreed that the promise was moot ... Śatrughna would have retaliated against Mantharā ... And since Mantharā never even mentions the rājya-śulka to Kaikayī, and Kaikayī never reminds Daśaratha of it, we can infer that Mantharā and Kaikayī didn't know about it.

Maybe the rājya-śulka was just a lie that Rāma told to make Bharata feel better. If we imagine that Rāma somehow knew about an agreement between Aśvapati and Daśaratha from long before he was born, we have to wonder whether the whole time Bharata was in Kekaya, he was hearing about it from witnesses to the agreement who wanted him to rule Kosala.

Thanks for the tag and you keeping track of all our scores you are amazing 👏 😳

Originally posted by: SoniRSippu21

Thanks😃 how many u got?

40😂

Though I don’t agree with many options but it is a personal opinion so going to settle with it😂😂

I want to be a judge woh zyada better hai but koi Mujhe banata hi nahi😢

What is our score?? Kal toh mere sirf ande aaye hai. Aaj I think sahi tha 🤣🤣

Cooker.......I am not able to tag you.

Originally posted by: Rani_Sahiba

Deserve toh woh throne bhi nahi karte the par mila na?? Waise birth ko hi basis banaya gaya throne ki liye just because Yudhishthir dharmaraj ka putra tha woh better tha or Duryodhan ko sideline kiya gaya jiska nateeja tha Mahabharat. Waise jo Aadmi gambling kare or apni biwi ko stake kare wo throne kaise deserve karta hai🤷‍♀️

Originally posted by: Rani_Sahiba

Lekin jis time yeh sab hua tha uss time social division or relationships itni clear nahi thi or dusra Kunti adopted thi toh no blood relation was there right??

Kunti was biological daughter of shurasena. Vasudev and kunti were siblings

Kunti was latter adopted by kuntibhoj. So subdhara nad arjuna are related by blood