Effeminate and Tomboys. - Page 9

Originally posted by: Mahisa_22

Bold: Er, bi and pan women CAN be attracted to men---please look up what 'bisexual' or 'pansexual' means.

A woman who is straight would not be attracted to a man who is noticeably effeminate. If she's attracted by overtly feminine traits and gestures, then it means she also finds women sexually attractive. Which means she's not straight. 😃

Hope your questions are answered.

Ah I see where you are coming from. One problem though, I am attracted to MALE BODIES. I like D*** 🙂 and Male hands and arms Not B**** Hips or V***** Like 😂??? I know that there is a whole movement that chats about 'hearts and not parts' but nope the female body has NEVER been attractive to me so... I mean if you're a straight woman you'd know exactly what I'm talking about so I don't understand how you can so easily say that. Also I think its incredibly offensive how you're equating effeminate men to women like this. Effeminate men are men tf. I dunno why ppl act like there is only one way to be a man.

I had a feeling this topic might bring the backwards folk out of the woodwork. In real life and online, I will never understand why people have so much to say about ppls love life. The amount of shit we would get when ppl (usually men) realised that my boyfriend was NOT my gay best friend was ridiculous. At times even violent. Are ppl really that surprised that ppl have different taste? There is literally someone for everyone.

Originally posted by: rocky212

Ah I see where you are coming from. One problem though, I am attracted to MALE BODIES. I like D*** 🙂 and Male hands and arms Not B**** Hips or V***** Like 😂??? I know that there is a whole movement that chats about 'hearts and not parts' but nope the female body has NEVER been attractive to me so... I mean if you're a straight woman you'd know exactly what I'm talking about so I don't understand how you can so easily say that. Also I think its incredibly offensive how you're equating effeminate men to women like this. Effeminate men are men tf. I dunno why ppl act like there is only one way to be a man.

Effeminate men are men with personalities which are incredibly feminine. As a woman, I can say that I'm not just turned on by a d*** alone but rather by the personality of the being who's attached to the d***. 😆And, I think, most women roll that way. They would vomit if they were to be only sent dik piks (unlike men who would LOOOVE to receive boob pics), but they would get IMMENSELY turned on if the guy had the right personality.

Originally posted by: rocky212

I had a feeling this topic might bring the backwards folk out of the woodwork. In real life and online, I will never understand why people have so much to say about ppls love life. The amount of shit we would get when ppl (usually men) realised that my boyfriend was NOT my gay best friend was ridiculous. At times even violent. Are ppl really that surprised that ppl have different taste? There is literally someone for everyone.

Now, now, let's not lose out shit and start calling people names like 'backward'. As you can see, me, Heisenberg, BI and quite a few others feel that straight women cannot be attracted to effeminate men.

It's an opinion, and you can respectfully disagree. We're not insulting anyone or any sexuality, so don't go

around calling people names for no reason.

Originally posted by: Heisenberg17_

lmao @social conditioning, the reason why most women aren't attracted to effeminate guys is the result of millions of years of evolution through natural selection, where women sought out men with certain desirable traits to mate with so that she and her offsprings have a better chance of surviving, this isn't a "justification", it's a scientific explanation, it is what is happening at the evolutionary level. No amount of social engineering or gender studies woke bollocks will overturn sexual partner preferences shaped by millions of years of evolution.

You might want to be careful before using retrospective "scientific" explanations to *predict* or rather speculate about future of human sexuality with certainty. Evolution has not stopped. What you are terming as social engineering/gender studies is also the product of the same evolution, which in turn could lead to powerful social conditioning. Maybe less probable but who knows. Evolutionary forecasting, while useful, is tricky and has had little success yet, it is not as successful as predicting the wave function of an electron using quantum theory.

What we perceive as *feminine* or *masculine* is constructed by many factors, including social factors (social construction). It will be weird to ignore social conditioning when dealing with these.

Originally posted by: FreeTheNipple

You might want to be careful before using retrospective "scientific" explanations to *predict* or rather speculate about future of human sexuality with certainty. Evolution has not stopped. What you are terming as social engineering/gender studies is also the product of the same evolution, which in turn could lead to powerful social conditioning. Maybe less probable but who knows. Evolutionary forecasting, while useful, is tricky and has had little success yet, it is not as successful as predicting the wave function of an electron using quantum theory.

What we perceive as *feminine* or *masculine* is constructed by many factors, including social factors (social construction). It will be weird to ignore social conditioning when dealing with these.

And evolution also throws up a lot of dead ends, I put these social engineering/gender studies programs in the same category, sure you can try and raise women to like effeminate men, not very likely to succeed. As for what the sexual preferences of men and women will be like in the distant future, I never made any prediction, but it is an undeniable fact that what we are today is shaped by millions of years of evolution, and I don't see this changing anytime soon. Despite a massive concerted effort to destroy gender roles and gender/sex itself, most straight women in general are still not attracted to effeminate men, nor straight men attracted to masculine women.

I don't like hairy men.

Originally posted by: Mahisa_22

What's so bad about being bi or pansexual? 😕

ehh when i did i say that ? i am talking about your assumption that if someone likes an effeminate guy then they are bi or pan which is so rubbish

Originally posted by: Heisenberg17_

lmao @social conditioning, the reason why most women aren't attracted to effeminate guys is the result of millions of years of evolution through natural selection, where women sought out men with certain desirable traits to mate with so that she and her offsprings have a better chance of surviving, this isn't a "justification", it's a scientific explanation, it is what is happening at the evolutionary level. No amount of social engineering or gender studies woke bollocks will overturn sexual partner preferences shaped by millions of years of evolution.

And what are those certain desirable traits and what makes you think offsprings of effeminate men don't have a chance at surviving? Come one, spew the rubbish which is in your mind.

This is just load of bullshit but it's not new. People try to justify anything nowadays in the name of "Science". How the fuck do you know how evolution would shape up in future?

Laugh all you want but social conditioning is a real thing. We don't live in a vacuum. How we think and perceive things always depends on how and where we grew up. Effeminate guys and tomboys break gender stereotypes and that's why they have a hard time finding partners.

Originally posted by: Mahisa_22

Theres a difference between lanky and effeminate. Also, straight women going for feminine men will NEVER be the trend in a million years. Facts are facts are facts.

I gave an example of lanky men. I know they are not the same.

And I'm saying it WOULD be a trend in million years. Facts are facts are facts.

See? Even I can predict anything and you won't know because you aren't living for million years either.