Hi Doc,
I guess you are still angry with Raghav and may find my post offending for the time being. Actually I thought of not commenting on this topic but I couldn't stop myself.
Everything about the post is right and I agree that Raghav shouldn't have chosen Keerthi over Pallavi knowing the crime she did. But again hasn't Pallavi initially chosen D'fam over everything and turned her face to every wrong activity that they did. It is only after marriage that she started siding with Raghav. Before marriage everytime Raghav was insulted or blamed she knew that her family was speaking one sided truth and BWA gang were liars yet she chose to support them not Raghav. I know Raghav too was very impulsive. But ever since the show began I have time and again said this "Both of them live for their families".
But when you said that what Amrutha and BWA did was nothing compared to what Keerthi did. I am really sorry I just couldn't agree to that point. You justified to someone that Keerthi murdered someone and is ready to put the blame on others and run away while BWA and Amrutha did not. Is that really true Doc? Do you really believe this? Ask this to yourself as a doctor not as a viewer right now.
Case 1: Amrutha ABORTED a child which in layman terms is referred to as murder of an unborn child. She and BWA put that blame on Pallavi and Raghav was dragged in it. Pallavi tried covering it up as much as possible but since Raghav's name was added he chose to clear it out. But Pallavi supported her family here and was not ready to let Amrutha suffer any punishment. At that point I remember how much this whole forum was against Pallavi. We all supported Raghav.
You say they got their share of punishment and Mansi's wedding was called off but was that punishment given in an instant. No it was episode 50 I still remember clearly. The whole forum was rejoicing that Raghav gave a bang on answer and cleared both their names because Pallavi was not ready to punish Amrutha.
Case 2: Keerthi (and Sunny since it is not shown yet) was in a hit and run case and drove her car over a living person and ran away. When the truth came out she started putting the blame on anyone she could be it Farhaad or Pallavi (For accusing her wrongly and calling her names). She is even unaffected by Raghav's surrender and Raghav wants to cover up for her. He is ready to do everything to get this case closed while Pallavi is by default the main victim here. This time Pallavi wants to clear out the air and bring the truth out in open while Raghav is adamant on covering up. This is the initial stage and final would be Pallavi successfully punishing the culprit just like Raghav did during the abortion case.
Today again this forum is angry with one of the leads trying to become Mahanta ki Murakh (As I like to call it).
But just compare the two scenarios.
Both had murders, murderers, victims, covering up, fights, family affairs and revealations.
How are these two scenarios different? I don't know but from my perspective, both the cases are same and equally heinious. The only difference is .... consented abortion doesn't go in for a police case. But murder to murder hi hai....be it the result of a fun night stand or the result of an amazing long drive. A murder is a murder.
PS: Doc please don't be offended. If you are then I am sorry.
Edited by Mihika - 4 years ago